Spontaneous Generations

 

Spontaneous Generation (singular)
"The theory of spontaneous generation states that life arose from nonliving matter. ... Louis Pasteur is credited with conclusively disproving the theory of spontaneous generation with his famous swan-neck flask experiment. He subsequently proposed that “life only comes from life.”
What was spontaneous generation and why was it wrong? It was once believed that life could come from nonliving things, such as mice from corn, flies from bovine manure, maggots from rotting meat, and fish from the mud of previously dry lakes. Spontaneous generation is the incorrect hypothesis that nonliving things are capable of producing life."

   Having disproved the notion that nonliving things were sometimes generated spontaneously, we now appear to be on the cusp of discovering that a generation cannot be conceived and developed on a whim. The notion that if you are a member of Generation Y (a Millennial), or are a Gen Xer, you are of a certain type, is now being questioned. 

   About four years ago, I indicated that I was a contrarian about cohorts such as those and will have little more to say about them. My original post is here and the title indicates how I felt about the subject: Millennial Nonsense: Generalizations About Generations. The only reason I raise the subject again, is because a few more articles have surfaced recently and they suggest not much is being gained by talking about Generation Whatever.  Here are some samples:

Sources: 

"It’s Time to Stop Talking About “Generations”: From Boomers to Zoomers, the Concept Gets Social History all Wrong," By Louis Menand, The New Yorker, Oct. 18, 2021.

‘Gen Z’ Only Exists in Your Head:  The dividing Lines Between Generations Are a Figment of our Collective Imagination," Joe Pinsker, Atlantic, Oct.14, 2021.

"You know there’s drama in research circles—or at least what qualifies as drama in research circles—when someone writes an open letter.

Earlier this year, that someone was Philip Cohen, a sociologist at the University of Maryland at College Park. His request: that Pew Research Center, the nonpartisan “fact tank,” “do the right thing” and stop using generational labels such as Gen Z and Baby Boomers in its reports. Some 170 social-science researchers signed on to Cohen’s letter, which argued that these labels were arbitrary and counterproductive...."

Generational labels capture some of the basic fact that people who are born in different eras lead meaningfully different lives. But these labels are clumsy and imprecise—and getting more so all the time. They flatten out the experiences of tens of millions of very different people, remove nuance from conversations, and imply commonality where there may be none. The social scientists are right: Generational labels are stupid.

"Answers to 10 Questions About Generations and Generational Differences in the Workplace," Cort W Rudolph, PhD, Rachel S Rauvola, PhD, David P Costanza, PhD, Hannes Zacher, PhD. Public Policy & Aging Report, Volume 30, Issue 3, 2020, Pages 82–88, https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/praa010

Conclusion:

Our goal with this work was to present answers to 10 common questions about generations and generational differences as they are assumed to operate in the workplace. Mannheim’s (1927/1952) original conceptualization of “the problem of generations” deals with questions about the mechanisms of social change. Given the answers to the preceding 10 questions, we would argue that there is a need to recast the problem of generations into more modern terms. The contemporary problem with generations lies in their ubiquity as an explanation for social phenomena. There is no credible evidence to suggest that generations exist, or that they manifest to influence behavior in any systematic way. Further, there is no value whatsoever in formulating organizational, economic, or labor policies based on these unsupported social constructions.

There you have it. Now that I am no longer a contrarian on this issue, I may have to reassess my position.