Sunday 27 August 2017

THE JUKEBOX


    One rarely sees such contraptions these days. For the youngsters I will provide a picture of one, along with the best description you will ever find. Although I recall well the one in our parent’s restaurant, I would never have thought of the glass panels as being full of orangeade or Chartreuse...



    “The evening of our arrival ended in a bar on the waterfront, where, in a setting of vaults, chintz curtains and indirect lighting, a number of sailors were clustered in silent homage around a jukebox. It was the first time I had seen one of these wonderful machines. The barman called it a Wurlitzer Nickelodeum. It was a shrine of steel and bakelite and glass, six feet high, and a queue of sailors were waiting to insert their nickels. At the drop of a coin, an unerring steel hand inside the tabernacle grasped the chosen record from the shelf and placed it on a disc that rose like a magic carpet. A needle-bearing arm descended and unleashed a muted throbbing and the voice of a crooner. The air was filled with etherialized treacle. Glass panels were illuminated in shades of mauve and pink, and liquids that must have been orangeade and Chartreuse and Grenadine syrup bubbled and glowed softly through a maze of decorative glass-piping with the intention of attuning the listener’s bloodstream to the mood of the music. Sailor after sailor slipped their coins into this engine, their eyes becoming every second mistier with Sehnsucht and Heimweh. The Nickelodeum is in its infancy. When it is perfected it is to be armed with slowly turning rollers of satin and fur and plush for the palms of the hands, and a battery of little scent sprays, while, from a bakelite orifice, an inch of barley sugar or Turkish delight, antiseptically sheathed in cellophane, will emerge, in order that all five senses, and not only two, may be simultaneously gratified.”

Source:
This passage is found in Patrick Fermor’s The Traveller’s Tree: A Journey Through the Caribbean Islands. The journey was taken in the late 1940s and the waterfront bar is in St Thomas.
Post Script:
It looks like my Penguin paperback was picked up on an island - the Black Sheep book store on Salt Spring Island, BC. It is, by the way, a wonderful book.

PERIODICAL RAMBLINGS (3)


The VILLAGE VOICE
    I am not sure if I would have included this publication among my ramblings, but I will take time on this fine late summer morning to let you know that the print version of The Village Voice will soon cease to exist. Those of you who lean to the right and those with relatively ‘normal’ sexual proclivities are likely not to care much. It did certainly tend to tilt left and the back pages were filled with advertisements for various sexual services and devices that most found to be rather mysterious.
    Still, it was a major publication that published established and well-known authors. One of the founders was Norman Mailer. It was hardly parochial and covered subjects of interest to those who lived outside of Greenwich. One of its owners was Rupert Murdoch. It received some Pulitzers. If you don’t believe me, consider this:
    “The Village Voice was founded in 1955. It is one of the most successful enterprises in the history of American journalism. It began as a neighborhood paper serving an area about a tenth the size of the Left Bank, in Paris, and it became, within ten years, a nationally known brand and the inspiration for a dozen other local papers across the country. By 1967, it was the best-selling weekly newspaper in the United States, with a single-day circulation higher than the circulations of ninety-five per cent of American big-city dailies. It survived the deaths of four other New York City newspapers and most of its imitators, and it has had a longer life than the weekly Life. But, in books about the modern press, it is given a smaller role than it deserves.”   “It Took a Village: How the Voice Changed Journalism,” Louis Menand, The New Yorker, Jan. 5, 2009.

     Although the website remains it is unfortunate that the print version will disappear. I think the passing of such publications deserves at least a passing mention.  I am heading to Vancouver soon and I will let you know if the Georgia Straight is still around. It was last year and, like The Village Voice, it still had ‘those’ ads.

Post Script

    The “death” of the print version of The Village Voice was announced in August 2017. See, for example:
“After 62 Years and Many Battles, Village Voice Will End Print Publication, John Leland and Sara Maslin Nir, The New York Times, Aug. 22, 2017

“GENERATIONS OF VILLAGE VOICE WRITERS REFLECT ON THE PAPER LEAVING THE HONOR BOXES:THE END OF AN ERA. Luke O’Neil, Esquire, Aug. 23, 2017.

“10 EX–VILLAGE VOICE STAFFERS SHARE WHAT THEY LEARNED—AND WHY THE PAPER MATTERED,” Zach Schonfeld, et al, Newsweek, Aug. 25, 2017.

    Here is the website for The Village Voice. I could not determine how far back the archive goes, but I did some searches and found articles from over a decade ago.

   The London Public Library did not get it, but Western University did, although the subscription was cancelled. It is available in the Weldon Library on microform for the years 1996-2015. Those associated with Western can access some years via various electronic vendors.

All is not lost. One can read a couple of compilations:

The Village Voice Anthology (1956-1980) : Twenty-five years of Writing From the Village Voice, edited by Geoffrey Stokes.
The Village Voice Reader : a Mixed Bag From the Greenwich Village Newspaper, Daniel Wolf.
Music Downtown : Writings From The Village Voice, Kyle Gann.

For two books about The Village Voice see:

The Great American Newspaper : The Rise And Fall Of The Village Voice,  Kevin Michael McAuliffe.
Writing The Record : The Village Voice And The Birth Of Rock Criticism, Devon Powers.

For over forty years The Village Voice was also the place one could find the cartoons of Jules Feiffer who won a Pulitzer in 1986.


Thursday 24 August 2017

PERIODICAL RAMBLINGS (2)

Fortune (Magazine)
 



    This is one in a series of posts about magazines and this one attempts to prove that even business journals can be interesting and attractive. (For more in this series on this blog see Periodical Ramblings.)

    Back in 2005 Fortune published a “75th Anniversary” issue which is full of useful information about its publishing history. The short essay that follows is about that issue and it was also written in 2005 in an attempt to encourage students to have a look at Fortune and to make them aware of the richness of the collection found in the stacks which they rarely visited. I doubt if it helped, but perhaps you will find the information to be of use.


[ This essay was published in 2005 in a newsletter produced by the staff at the C.B. “Bud” Johnston Library at the University of Western Ontario (now Western University). It is no longer found on the library website. What follows was retrieved from the Internet Archive. A few editorial notes are added in brackets and are bolded - like this one. I wrote the original and am alone responsible for it and the edited comments. The newsletter was called The Bottom Feeder. Jerry Mulcahy. June 2017]

Fortune Magazine - 75th Anniversary Issue

    


    Serious students of business - particularly those interested in business journalism - should have a look at the Fortune issue dated September 19, 2005 (Vol.152, No.6) where it is noted that:

"Ever since  our first issue in  1930, Fortune has been known for storytelling. There's the classic walking-the-halls-of-power company profile. The deeply reported tale that reveals a technological revolution. Insightful articles about leadership, big ideas and social change. Beautifully rendered photo essays. Great new examples of all these - and more - can be found in this special 75th Anniversary edition."

    Henry Luce, the founder, thought that "accurately, vividly and concretely to describe modern business is the greatest journalistic assignment in history". The magazine was luxuriously launched with 18th century Baskerville type on "wild wove antique" paper and hand sewn between 125-pound weight covers that often required many press runs. Fortune was large, beautiful and expensive and it was introduced just as the depression began.            

Fortune is often analyzed in American Studies programs and is the rare business periodical that is the subject of debate in American intellectual history. During its early years, the magazine exhibited great art, published great writers and took stands that seem odd for a 'business' magazine. A good description of the early Fortune is provided in the opening paragraph of a new book by Michael Augspurger about the magazine:

“To open a Fortune magazine from the 1930s of 1940s is to confront a series of incongruities. Here is a self-described "beautiful" magazine that devoted itself not to society life or fashion but to the grim world of business and industry in an era of economic disruption and tragedy; a magazine presumed to be a "booster" for business that printed scathing exposes not only of easy targets like the munitions industry, but of U.S. Steel and the housing industry and the producers of women's clothing; a champion of corporate capitalism that acknowledged the right of unions to strike, supported higher wages, and called for federal programs ranging from social security to the Securities Exchange Commision. Beyond these economic tensions, however, the magazine's intense interest in art and culture, whether in the form of rare books, or the art programs of the federal Works Progress Administration, seems inconsistent with its business focus. An essay on the American workingman might be illustrated not only by Margaret Bourke-White's industrial photographs but also by paintings by Reginald Marsh and Thomas Benton, and sculptures by Max Kalish. A piece on the bullfighting industry might be contributed by Ernest Hemingway and complemented by the art of Goya and Eduard Manet. Any one issue might contain an essay on major American orchestras, the revival of the craft of stained glass, or the state of American painting. Even the magazine's writers were poets and intellectuals, whether remembered like James Agee, Archibald Macleish, and Dwight Macdonald, or otherwise.”

    As an aside, it could be argued that our own Business Quarterly was influenced by Fortune, in that the covers often were aesthetically pleasing (see, for example, the Summer issue of 1988 which displays a Picasso painting. Business Quarterly  also began in the 30s and continues online as the Ivey Business Journal). [Business Quarterly was published by the Business School at the University of Western Ontario. Its successor is now produced by the same school which is now known as the Ivey Business School at the same university which is now called Western University].

    The anniversary issue of Fortune provides some of the photos and contains an interesting essay about a story that they did not publish - the one that became the book, Let Us Now Praise Famous Men. Those interested in the role of women in business should read "My 51 Years and Counting" by Carol Loomis which begins on p. 298. That essay should be supplemented by the following chapter that discusses, among other things, the use of "girl" researchers by the magazine: "Fortune: Vol. I, No. I",  in Elson's Time Inc. The Intimate History of a Publishing Enterprise, 1923-1941. For a thorough discussion of Fortune see: An Economy of Abundant Beauty: Fortune Magazine and Depression America by Michael Augspurger.

    Fortunately, we have a complete run of Fortune in our collection and you should have a look at the older volumes which are in the oversize area (as another aside, the folks at the Canadian office of another major American business publication- Business Week- donated a pristine set of volumes of that magazine, the covers which are displayed here, along with some details). As well, there are other related books such as Walker Evans at Fortune, 1945-1965 and a large number of works by and about Bourke-White, whose photographs are frequently found in Fortune. In 2005 an example of how Fortune is used in an American Studies program is provided at the University of Virginia, along with a display of some of the covers of the magazine.
[After this was written the old issues of Fortune were placed in storage and one can no longer browse through them. Gone also are the “pristine” bound copies of Business Week. Interestingly enough, Fortune is still being used in the UVA American Studies Program along with a display of covers. J.M. Aug. 2017]   


Post Script

   It is noted above that the book Let Us Now Praise Famous Men by James Agee began as an article for Fortune, but was never published in the magazine.  Recently the manuscript intended for Fortune was discovered and has been published in book form as: Cotton Tenants: Three Families, edited by John Summers with photographs by Walker Evans. A portion of the book can be read in The Baffler (No. 19, March 2012) which is responsible for the publication of the book by Melville House.

Here is the background piece that explains why the story was never published:

“The Most Famous Story We Never Told”, Whitford, David, Yang, Jia Lynn, Fortune, Vol. 152, Issue 6, 2005.
“In 1936 this magazine sent a poet and a photographer to Hale County in Alabama to document the lives of sharecroppers. The result wasn't published in these pages, but became a celebrated book. Sixty-nine years later, we return.
Sixty-nine years ago, in the summer of 1936, FORTUNE sent writer Agee and photographer Evans south to document the lives of cotton sharecroppers. Their story was to be part of a series called "Life and Circumstances." Agee was a published poet, not long out of Harvard, who once described himself as "a great deal more a communist than not." Evans--the partner Agee insisted upon for this plum assignment--was on loan to FORTUNE from the Farm Security Administration. They left New York by car on a mid-June afternoon and were gone two months, long enough for Agee to conclude that the story he had found was too subversive for FORTUNE, and possibly bigger than any magazine could hold, and more important than his career. So when his editors demanded a second draft, and Agee refused, and the story finally was killed, that was okay. "Half unconsciously, and half consciously, Agee saw to it that it would not get into FORTUNE," Evans later said.
Houghton Mifflin published Let Us Now Praise Famous Men in 1941, with photographs by Evans.

Here are some excerpts from Cotton Tenants which may indicate why Agee’s work was not published in Fortune.

On pregnancy:
“How late in her pregnancy a woman works around the house and in the fields and how soon she gets back to work again depends on her health and how much grit she has. Since that is the code she believes in and lives up to the answer is, she works as late and soon as she can stand to, which is likely to mean later and sooner than she should.”

On Infant mortality:
“Of the seven children the Tingles have lost, one lived to be four, and pulled a kettle of scalding water over on him. (Such accidents, with milder results, are not infrequent in large families with distracted mothers.) One lived to be five and ate some bad bologna sausage one night and was dead before morning. The rest died within their first year. One died of colitis. From what people said of it another must have died of infantile paralysis. The rest, they don’t know what they died of, the doctor never told them. William Fields’s twin died winter before last, of pneumonia. Last winter William was very sick, too. He got choking spells and his face got as black as a shoe. The doctor has told them that unless his tonsils are removed he may not live through another winter. They don’t know whether or not to believe him; meantime there are other expenses already incurred that they can’t afford as it is. The Burroughses’ daughter Martha Ann was six months old when she died. The doctor found out what it was but there was nothing he could do about it. It was an abscess behind the eye.”

A typical Evan’s photo:




Wednesday 23 August 2017

Schulich-Woolf Rare Book Collection









   
Seymour Schulich


    The name above will be very familiar to most Canadians since it is seen in association with just about any institution of higher learning in Canada. At the university close by, for example, one finds the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry and scattered across the country one will see the Schulich name attached to various disciplines, scholarships and other academic endeavours. Sometimes the name is hidden behind the name of another. The Harris Learning Library at Nipissing University is named for the former Premier of Ontario because Mr. Schulich donated money to have it so-named (he also provided $15 million to Nipissing’s Faculty of Education.)


    One does not tend, however, to associate the name ‘Schulich’ with rare books. Perhaps we prefer to think of philanthropists as philistines since surely money-grubbers cannot also be book collectors. Apparently that is not the case with Mr. Schulich.


Daniel Woolf


    Mr. Woolf is the Principal and Vice-Chancellor of Queen’s University. He is also a historian and book collector. At a meeting with Mr. Schulich it was discovered that they both shared an interest in rare books. “Because we’re both passionate about sharing this material with the broader academic community, we agreed to give our collections and create the Schulich-Woolf Rare Book Collection,” according to Principal Woolf. He decided to give to Queen’s his impressive incunabula collection and Mr. Schulich brought to the table his rare books along with $1 million for preservation and expansion of the collection. The Schulich-Woolf Rare Book Collection is found in the Douglas Library at Queen’s as part of the W.D. Jordan Rare Books & Special Collections.


    I mention all of this because this donation did not attract as much attention as the many others he has made. I noticed it because of an announcement (advertisement) made by Queen’s which appeared in the Globe and Mail late in 2015. The Gaels have reason to gloat and sing “The Oil Thigh”. For more about the collection see below.


Sources:
“Philanthropist, Principal Establish Rare Book Collection,” Mark Kerr, Queen’s Gazette, December 18, 2015.
For a description of the Schulich-Woolf Rare Book Collection.
Principal Woolf’s collection had been displayed in 2014. See “Impressive Incunabula,” Nov. 14, 2014, Queen’s Gazette.


For the Nipissing University example: “Name of Harris Learning Library Unveiled,”
Nugget, August 17, 2010. (Of course, not everyone was pleased by this name choice.)
For a good recent summation of Schulich donations see: “Mega-donor Seymour Schulich Sets the Bar Higher for Education; If the various Schulich faculties at six different universities were relocated, they would represent a mid-size Canadian campus of 16,500 students,” Jennifer Lewington, The Globe and Mail, June 29, 2017.


Tuesday 22 August 2017

Chimen Abramsky’s Memory








    If anyone read this blog they would recall, if their memory is better than mine, that I have at times posted about people with good memories. That is to say, people who had the ability to retain information, not people who had only good things to remember. I have also written about libraries. This post is about both these things.
    
     The gentleman with the amazing memory is Chimen Abramsky who amassed a significant library full of books about Judaism and socialism. The rest of the house in which the books were housed was also often packed with interesting intellectuals.  Recently Chimen Abramsky’s grandson, Sasha Abramsky, devoted a book to the bibliophile and in one of the reviews, here is what I noticed about the subject of memory:

“According to Abramsky, Chimen’s father Yehezkel, a legendary rabbi whose funeral in Jerusalem in 1976 was attended by forty thousand mourners, possessed a photographic memory. By age eight, Yehezkel had memorized the Pentateuch and would astonish the locals in his village in Eastern Europe by reciting any Jewish religious text he was asked to reproduce. Chimen, who was born in 1916 in what is now Belarus, himself evinced similar prowess: “In the rare instances,” writes Abramsky, “when Chimen could not respond to a question off the top of his head, he knew exactly which of his tens of thousands of books contained the answer, what page the information was on, and where along his many double-stacked bookshelves the volume could be located.” (“The Man With 20,000 Books”, Jacob Heilbrunn, The National Interest, Dec. 20, 2015.)


Additional Sources:
For an interesting video by the author that describes the collection and which includes comments by his grandfather click on the link inside this description at the New York Review Books.
See also the author’s background piece in “Lives & Letters: House of Books,” The Guardian, Jan. 1, 2011- “Visiting his grandfather Chimen as a boy, Sasha Abramsky would discuss socialist doctrine over matzo-ball soup with Isaiah Berlin and other great thinkers of the day.”
For reviews:  “ ‘The House of Twenty Thousand Books’ Re-creates an Intellectual Milieu,” Michael Dirda, Washington Post, Oct. 7, 2015.
‘The House of Twenty Thousand Books’, by Sasha Abramsky,  by Rebecca Abrams, Financial Times, July 18, 2014.

For other memory pieces in this blog see the posts for: Chomsky, Porson and Empson.

Tuesday 1 August 2017

SHOOTING AT WESTERN



[Abstract: An abstract is  a rather odd odd thing to find in a blog where posts are supposed to be short. This one isn’t. The subject does involve the academy though and therefore one is provided. What follows, however, is not academic. There is only one mention of ‘post-colonial’ and the word ‘hegemony’ appears not at all (except for there). It concerns sporting and recreational matters at the university nearby. It is likely to be of interest to only a few old coots who used to sit perspiring by ‘the cage’ after using the courts, or those old enough to have played handball in Thames Hall.]




Up at the Odditorium


     A report was released recently at Western University and I am certain it passed unnoticed by those in the town, and was unread by the gowns who are long-gone. It covered two subjects which, I can also say with some certainty, are not of much concern to most faculty or administrators: sport and recreation. In a campus competition between the Hearties and the Aesthetes, the latter would win hands down (to use a good, old sporting term). Most faculty would argue that collegiate sports and the scholarships that go with them are best left in the States and recreational activities should not be allowed to distract the students and drain dollars from the coffers. Although I did not read the full report, I gather from the summary of it that money is the issue - isn’t it generally? (see: “Current Sport and Rec Model Unsustainable,” Jason Winders, Western News, July 12, 2017.)


Sport and Recreation


    Given that the subjects are not of much concern and we know that after more deliberations and committee meetings additional funding will not be forthcoming, why am I wasting our time on this? Partially because I will offer a solution below and it will explain the picture and title above. It is also the case that I am a contrarian by nature. Although I lost interest in most sports years ago there are at least a couple of reasons why they might be considered of some use on a campus.


    One of them is that the University of Western Ontario had a solid tradition of fielding some fine teams and producing some excellent athletes. Perhaps the best example is provided by the squash team. I am sure it is the only Canadian university team in any sport to win an NCAA title and the only one to ever have any NCAA All-Americans, as well as a coach who is in that body’s Hall of Fame. Although the Mustang squash team just won the OUA title for the 34th straight year, it no longer competes in the top tier of the NCAA and support has dwindled. They play and practice off-campus and it looks like they will soon be just a club.


    So what, say the Aesthetes? Well, I would think that the students learned something on the trips to Harvard and Princeton and the students there learned, at least, there was a University of Western Ontario. As well, I would think that such a tradition must translate into some alumni loyalty and even dollars. One could argue that it is perhaps better to retire with a strong reputation while winning, but generally winning looks better than retiring in the promotional literature. There will soon be yet another ranking in which Western doesn’t appear.


Campus Rec




    The case for ‘recreation’ is a little harder to make, especially to taxpayers. If you are going to compete with other universities in the recruiting race, however, then you better have great recreational facilities if you wish to attract good students. You certainly need to have them if you ‘brand’ yourself by saying you offer “Canada’s Best Student Experience”:  At Western University, we pride ourselves on offering the best student experience - inside and outside the classroom! We have an entire portfolio dedicated to Student Experience so when you arrive on campus you have the support you need to engage in student activies [sic] and fully enjoy student life at Western.


    Finding funding for even the very popular and more utilitarian STEM subjects is very difficult. Creating a PowerPoint in support of a bowling alley for the rec center on campus  is even more so. Here is one bullet that might help: Our Competitors are Offering Water Slides and Lazy Rivers. (that is not a joke; sources to follow). That’s all I can think of.


Campus Wreck


     It is highly likely Western is soon only going to have a few very inexpensive teams and just in those sports that are popular. One of them, ironically enough, is now recognized as being rather unhealthy for those who play it. All the other athletic activities will take place in very cheap clubs.
    
    Students in some sports will be okay. Those interested in soccer, for example, can bring their own ball and play in the remaining corn field over at Brescia. Administrators and Aesthetes will argue that one does not need institutional support to be successful while running around in shorts. That is true. Our son played a lot of Ultimate at University. He played, as did his wife, in international championship games in Toronto and Sarasota, FL and she played in the World Championships in Perth. He played in the World Championships in Sapporo, Japan where his Canadian team won the world title. (You probably didn’t know that “Ultimate” is the name given to the sport played with a plastic flying disc more commonly known as a ‘frisbee’ or that the Canadians held a world title in it). The point is, they did it on their own dimes and were successful.


    Students needing more than a frisbee, however, may expect and require a little more; a gym or rink, for example. Eliminating teams and offering nominal support to clubs also presents a problem for the university recruiters: Come to Western and for a great student experience be sure to bring your racquet and cab fare for the ride to the London Squash Club.


     Having enticed you this far by offering the promise of a solution I will confess that it is a limited one. Nor is it entirely surprising since it is a product of the current entrepreneurial Zeitgeist. In short, students will have to raise the money themselves and be diligent about ensuring that the money raised is not diverted for other purposes by the administrators and those in the Development Office(s). A case study is presented to show how the future of campus rec might evolve.


A Shooting (or RIfle or Pistol or Revolver) Club


    Your first objection to this case is likely to be that currently there is no such club on campus. That is correct. I do recall, however, that when playing squash in the bowels of Alumni Hall years ago, the smack of the ball was often matched by sound of a rifle - from the firing range behind us. (As a very relevant aside, the doors of the squash courts were locked at some point, apparently because no one was willing or able to pay the university rent, or pay for having them cleaned. When we offered to sweep the courts, I think the the issue of liability was raised - isn’t it generally? What if someone slipped in the dust? They remained vacant and unused for years).


   Since you probably do not trust my memory and since I realize it is often faulty, I went looking for supporting evidence. None is found anywhere on the Western website, but, it is found in the Occidentalia. A “Rod & Gun Club” is mentioned in 1966, a “Revolver Club” in 1968.  A “Rifle and Pistol Club” existed on campus even in more recent and enlightened times. An account of its demise in 1997 is found in full below and is provided because: a) it proves there was such a club;  b) more data are needed for our case study; c) you wouldn’t be able to find it; and d) it shows how little has changed in 20 years. What follows is from the Gazette.
                       “Campus Club Gets Shot Down”, by Maija Ambrogio Gazette Writer.
Western's Rifle and Pistol club no longer has a home in Alumni Hall and no longer carries the Western title.
    Recently, three decisions were made regarding the immediate future of the club. Firstly, Campus Recreation's support and endorsement of Rifle and Pistol club activities was terminated, said Elizabeth Elliot, coordinator of physical fitness and sport instruction at Campus Recreation. "This was done because the club was not filling the recreation mandate including a component of physical activity," Elliot said.
   Due to withdrawal of support, Campus Recreation closed the shooting range facility in Alumni Hall as it was no longer needed.
   This decision was supported by Western's senior administration, said Beverly Green, assistant to Peter Mercer, VP-administration. Western's name was then removed from the club to protect the university from potential liability, Green said.
    Rifle and Pistol Club president Jason Brown and vice-president Terrence C. Biggs said they are unable to explain why the club's support was withdrawn and are skeptical of the reasons provided.
   To correct the lack of physical activity, Biggs proposed events which involved cross-country running accompanied by target shooting in which the competitors' times are recorded.         
   "Although a formal proposal was never received, the university does not have a venue that is suitable for that type of shooting," Elliot said.
    Green argued there is an element of risk associated with the Rifle and Pistol club as well. However, Brown said during the club's 35 years, there has never been one accident or complaint.
    There was one more issue outlined in a letter to Biggs from Elliot. "In the current fiscal climate, it has become necessary to streamline several programs within the organization."
In order to offset the $14,513 annual cost of the shooting range, Biggs proposed the club pay half this amount, which would be taken from the $50 membership fee paid by the 230 to 250 members each year.
    Green claims that currently the Chief Provincial Firearms' office is in negotiations with the club and she hopes a suitable solution for all can be found.


This piece was followed by a letter that is perhaps a trifle overwrought. But, it certainly proves that clubs can matter to some students.


Volume 91, Issue 15
Tuesday, September 23, 1997


“Will Your Club Be the Next to Face The Firing Squad:”
To the Editor:
    This letter is directed to students, alumni and clubs on campus to alert them to a situation currently affecting the UWO Rifle & Pistol club. Although the club has operated on campus for more than 35 years and has an exemplary record for safety and education, Campus Recreation and the university administration has, without consulting the club, assigned room 18, The Range, located in Alumni Hall, to another tenant and de-affiliated the club without cause. I urge all students, alumni and Western clubs, to offer their support by contacting Dr. Peter Mercer, VP-Administration and General Council, requesting this arbitrary decision be rescinded, to ensure the continued operation of this club as part of Western's heritage.
    Please consider the following quote by Pastor Martin Niemoller: "In Germany they first came for the communists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a communist. They came for the Jews and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade Unionists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade Unionist. Then they came for the Catholics and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me and by that time no one was left to speak up."
    Speak up! Be heard! Will your club, organization or group be the next target?
William R. Sherman
HBA Class of 1977


     The second objection to a gun club was raised above by the canny administrator who noted that the activities within it do not constitute “physical activity” and others will say it is not a ‘sport’. To that, one can respond that “They shoot at the Olympics don’t they and Western has an Olympic Center.” To end the argument one can mention that the European Court of Justice just ruled that BRIDGE is a sport.


    Another objection to using a shooting club as an example is that it is a dangerously dumb one which is unlikely to be very popular among those students who are not members of the alt-right. That may or may not be the case, but gun clubs and teams are very popular south of the border. “Teams are thriving at a diverse range of schools: Yale, Harvard, the University of Maryland, George ­Mason University, and even smaller schools such as Slippery Rock University in Pennsylvania and Connors State College in Oklahoma.” If you are not impressed by the example of Connors State, consider MIT where “We literally have way more students interested than we can handle,” said Steve Goldstein, one of MIT’s pistol coaches.” Note especially that he is just one of the  pistol coaches.


     Perhaps students up here are different, but even if not, a club might attract more American students with stronger dollars. Western could be an “early adopter” (which will look good on a PowerPoint slide) and beat our Canadian competitors to the gun. The administrators involved with Western’s facilities probably know all of this as members of ACUI (the Association of College Unions International). The ACUI, among other things, held the recent Collegiate Clay Target Championships from which the picture above, of smiling male and female students, was taken. Over 800 students attended from 85 schools.


   The final and major objection to supporting a gun club or team is that firearms are very, very bad and kill people. Do we really want to follow the example I provided of a bunch crackers enjoying themselves at collegiate shooting contests? (I think it is still okay to demean white southerners, as long as they are either male or female.) Besides what about Virginia Tech where a student recently shot 32, about twice as many as the guy shot from the tower at the University of Texas?


  Good points, but one can support guns without recommending “campus carry” laws” and guns can be used recreationally to shoot at clays rather than pigeons. As well, the guy in the tower could have driven to campus and mowed down just as many, a not infrequent maneuver these days. Still we drive cars.
   
    Having dealt with the objections to our case study example, we can now turn to reasons for supporting such activities. A powerful one can be summed up simply by using the word “Diversity”, a construct not to be questioned on a campus. Surely supporting multifarious activities is intrinsically a good thing.


      
    Having proven that the shooting sports are currently popular ones we can now defend them by reverting to tradition. There were, after all, gun clubs at Western in the past just as Yale long had a Skeet and Trap Shooting Team. Hunting is also traditional. I think the Queen only missed shooting last Christmas because she was sick. Hunting and shooting are also sports. Loyal readers of this blog may remember the definition I provided from an English gentlemen in the 19th century who insisted that sports were only those activities involving guns, not silly little balls. (I hope that the hunting example may have some support among the indigenous  on campus to offset all the post-colonials who will oppose anything relating to the English.)


  Another minor point, before I move to the big one. Efficiencies will result from having students involved in a shooting club. Any who apply for admission and express an interest in such a club could be granted admission without further scrutiny. Such people will have had to pass the Ontario Hunter Education Course and the Canadian Firearms Safety Course which suggests  they have the potential to pursue a Ph.D.


    The main reason for choosing a gun club to illustrate how clubs could be successful in the hard times ahead at Western is because it is the only sport I could think of that could get a lot of cash. The rise of the shooting sports on campuses is not just an accident or an incidental fad. As proof consider this: “The firearms industry has poured millions of dollars into college shooting clubs, and many students’ views about guns have evolved. Although some collegiate teams date to the late 1800s, coaches and team captains say there is a surge of new interest from students, both male and female, ­finally away from their parents and curious to handle one of the country’s most divisive symbols. Once they fire a gun, students say they find shooting relaxing — at MIT, students call it “very Zen” — and that it teaches focusing skills that help in class.”


    As a practical example of how this might play out on campus consider this one: “MIT’s rifle team has varsity status and competes in NCAA-sanctioned matches with funding from the athletic department. The pistol team has club-sport status, meaning it must get its funding elsewhere. For that, it relies heavily on the MidwayUSA Foundation, which sets up an account for each school that alumni or others donate to. The foundation then matches donations and invests the money. Teams can draw 5 percent of their funds each year. The pistol team’s account balance is more than $363,000.”


     I hinted earlier that the solution of student fund raising for teams and clubs is somewhat limited and that their entrepreneurial actions are likely to work only for certain sports - such as shooting. I was pleased to learn recently that Western has a polo team. That is the type of elite activity that may attract some attention and money from the very rich. As well, students might harness their fundraising to the Liberal Party and suggest that the polo team is assisting in the efforts to revive the horse racing industry in Ontario. Imagination as well as entrepreneurship is required. That will likely not be enough for the wrestlers and fencers who will have to fend for themselves.


    It is easy to predict that the Aesthetes will emerge from the scrum in possession of most of the cash (of which there is not nearly enough) and that is as it should be. It is also easy to take pot shots at the process from a fair distance. It is worth taking them, however, to make the point that in the highly competitive academic arms race all flanks need support and protection.
    
Sources:
The formal title of the recent Western report is: The Weese Report SRS 2.0: Ensuring a Foundation for Success, July 2017.
Competition for students is intense and is likely to increase. Tuition costs continue to rise, Incentives are required - even rather frivolous ones. See: Making a Splash on Campus: College Recreation Now Includes Pool Parties and River Rides,” Courtney Rubin, New York Times, Sept. 19, 2014. The lazy river pictured can be enjoyed at Texas Tech.
Canada does have a world championship in Ultimate. See: “Nomads Win World Ultimate Championship Trophy: The Nomads, a Displaced Team of Former UVic Students, That Won the Men’s Over-33 World Ultimate Frisbee Championship in Japan Last Week,” Travis Paterson, Victoria News, July 19, 2012.
It is a very popular sport, especially on the West Coast and clearly such teams and clubs create some comradery. There is a team at Western.
See here and here.
“Gun Industry’s Helping Hand Triggers a Surge in College Shooting Teams,” Michael S. Rosenwald, Washington Post, March 15, 2015. To see the extent of the support see the site of the National Shooting Sports Foundation. Perhaps it is not a bad thing to have some of the NSSF and NRA money go to recreational activities rather than more lethal ones.
For the Collegiate Clay Target Championships and the ACUI. (The source for the picture at the top.)
You probably think I am joking about polo at Western. Think again.


Coming up soon (perhaps): FISHING AT WESTERN
Intercollegiate fishing is probably more popular than shooting and even more lucrative for the students involved. I was glad to see that a few students have formed a club at Western. Western does have a rich tradition in intercollegiate fishing, believe it or not, that pre-dates the current fad. I may reveal more later (perhaps).