There has been enough ranting this year so I will usher it out by offering some short posts related to past ones. They are meant as rewards for my loyal readers, but those of you who are locked in and desperate for something to do are welcome to read along.
Thursday, 31 December 2020
Year Ends & Odds
Books By The Meter
Colourful Books |
This is a short, year-end post that is intended to be more useful than most, and will be if you fall into either of these categories: 1) someone looking for a business opportunity; 2) someone who quickly wants to buy a bunch of books or 3) someone who Zooms a lot.
Like all of the other good ideas which you have found on this blog, this one is not mine. It does, however, issue from the state in which I was born - Maryland. Specifically it comes from Wonder Book which is a bookseller, but better known for the service which it provides - SELLING BOOKS BY THE FOOT.
All those of you in the entrepreneurial first group have to do is import the idea from "Books By The Foot" and change the name to "Books By The Meter". It is unlikely that this would be viewed as some kind of 'infringement', but if you are worried simply change the name to "Books By The Metre" and surely no one down there would figure out what you are up to.
If you are hunkered down in your jammies and just want books to read during the next dreary six months, but have carpal tunnel syndrome from all of your online ordering, simply go to this one website and type in “send me three feet of mystery books," or Harlequins, or "six feet of books that are like 50 Shades of Gray." Soon you will receive them.
If you are in the last group and are working from home and not supposed to be reading, but wish to appear to be well-read for that Zoom call, simply order three shelves of distressed looking history books, or the same number of current looking political books, or whatever your particular audience might appreciate. It will be impressive and they will not know you are wearing sweatpants and haven’t read a book since the Internet was invented.
Solid Colour Books |
The Prime Minister |
Wednesday, 30 December 2020
Factlet (7)
Conundrum Along the Charles
MIT didn't. Instead one has to take a "conceptual swim test." Some students found the class, which stretches around four hours in one session, grueling -- especially since swimming the actual test would normally take about 10 minutes.
Tuesday, 29 December 2020
More Contrarian News For Old Codgers (OATS4)
I would not ordinarily post another item in my series on Old Age ThemeS at this time of year since they are generally negative in tone. That is because my approach is an evidence-based one and the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that it is better to be younger. My intention here is positive, however, in that I simply want to wish you a Happy New Year and suggest that you Relax, Rest and Lighten-Up. The data suggest such an approach could be good for you, so perhaps you should have a drink and slow down on the puzzling and gaming. Those of you who know me are likely to question my judgement and ignore my advice, for many good reasons, so here are the studies you will not have read in those sunny CARP and AARP publications.
The headline here should be enough: "Excessive Brain Activity Linked to a Shorter Life." That probably does not suffice and you are probably thinking I made it up or grabbed it from The Onion. I didn't. It is at the top of an article in The Washington Post that you will find in the Oct.16, 2019 issue. It was written by Carolyn Y. Johnson. That also is probably not good enough since it is just a newspaper article, so you will be saddened to learn that she is reporting on the results published in a respected journal. But, actually you should be happy since you don't have to exercise your brain so hard. Here is all you need to know:
One key to a longer life could be a quieter brain without too much neural activity, according to a new study that examined postmortem brain tissue from extremely long-lived people for clues about what made them different from people who died in their 60s and 70s.
“Use it or lose it” has dominated thinking on how to protect the aging brain, and extensive research shows there are many benefits to remaining physically and mentally active as people get older. But the study, published in the journal Nature, suggests more isn’t always better. Excessive activity — at least at the level of brain cells — could be harmful.
“The completely shocking and puzzling thing about this new paper is … [brain activity] is what you think of as keeping you cognitively normal. There’s the idea that you want to keep your brain active in later life,” said Michael McConnell, a neuroscientist at the Lieber Institute for Brain Development, who was not involved in the study. “The thing that is super unexpected is … limiting neural activity is a good thing in healthy aging. It’s very counterintuitive.”
Contrarian News for Old Codgers (OATS1)
Charcoal Fueled Automobiles
This is Abandoned Project #737 and it does actually have to do with cars that use charcoal as fuel. I am really abandoning the subject in 2020 since it is highly unlikely that I will take it up in 2021, given where it resides in the queue of things which remain unfinished. You are likely to be interested in such an unusual topic and eager to learn more, but you are probably fatigued more than usual at this covid year end. So, I will make it easy for you.
There is no specific Wikipedia entry, but there is a good article that will provide you with all you need, or probably want to know. It is found, appropriately enough, in Low-Tech Magazine - "Wood Gas Vehicles: Firewood in the Fuel Tank." One reason I am now abandoning what I thought was an unheard of subject is because quite a few people know about it. I am assuming that you are not among them.
Although the link provided above has been around for many years, it may not be around in the years to come - it is, after all, found in a publication that is 'Low-Tech'. Where would that leave readers of this blog who happen to stumble over this post a few years from now? It is out of concern for them that I offer more. You are free to go.
They would likely want to know how I came upon such a subject. I found it mentioned in what is regarded as one of the greatest travel accounts of the last century: The Road to Oxiana, by Robert Byron (no relation.) If you weren't particularly interested in the workings of internal combustion engines, you now are likely to be more intrigued. I recently discovered some old notes of mine and it is them that I am about to abandon and toss out, to make room for more projects to be abandoned in my few remaining years.
The first mention is found in the introduction: “From Beriut [sic] they were supposed to be conveyed to Persia by some young British friends making a publicity expedition in two Rolls-Royces burning charcoal instead of gasoline. When to no one’s great surprise these failed to appear, Byron and Sykes proceeded by themselves.... There is not really much information about the charcoal burners in the Road to Oxiana and that is what led me to start poking around.
I do not recall what surprised me most, that, a) cars could run on charcoal or b) anyone would trust a British-made vehicle for such a long journey. Perhaps they were better in the 1930s. The trip, by the way was not a short one - it was 6,000 miles, the approximate distance from England to Oxiana, which was a vague region somewhere in northern Afghanistan. The Rolls were of the 'Silver Ghost' type and one was driven by Colonel Noel, accompanied by Mrs. Noel. They were also described as 'open tourers' and here is the proposed route:
"The route taken will be to Brindisi and thence by boat to Haifa. From there the cars will go to Damascus, Baghdad, and on to Teheran [sic]. If permission can be obtained Colonel Noel will go through Afghanistan.
You will agree that it was surely an exciting adventure, the purpose of which was described in The Times on Oct. 19, 1933:
Colonel Noel stated that the objects of his 6,000 mile journey were to revive the charcoal industry in India and to keep in this country money now spent on imported petrol. Charcoal was able to do the work of petrol and it was cheaper. Twelve pounds of charcoal were equal in power to about one gallon of petrol.
Future readers may be more interested than you in alternatives for petrol, since interest is inversely related to the availability of it. Right now there is a glut. While I have indicated that you can find plenty of pieces about charcoal burning cars, future readers will likely appreciate the kind of bespoke references I will offer below, which illustrate that interest was high when gasoline was scarce and that the charcoal powered vehicles were found around the globe. I will begin with Canada.
Sources;
Canada
In 1943 one finds an article indicating that a Forestry Department boat was propelled by sawdust in Parry Sound and others indicating that newspaper publishers with plants in Canada were using charcoal to power engines at pulp mills. See: "Sawdust Drives Launch Nearly As Well as Gas," Globe & Mail, July 19, 1943. For a government study see: "Wood and Charcoal as Motor Fuel," Dept. of Mines and Resources, 1936. The pamphlet begins by indicating that there has been little interest in charcoal as a fuel in the U.S. and Canada because there was lots of gas and it was cheap. In B.C. various types of trees were analyzed with regards to their suitability as sources for charcoal and it was suggested that it could be used for fuel to run stationary engines in isolated areas in the far north.,
The first reference I found was from 1902 in a New York Times article on Nov. 16 under "Automobile Topics of Interest."
There are many articles from France including this one about Imbert, an early inventor: "USES CHARCOAL GAS TO DRIVE AUTOMOBILE: Alsatian Inventor Puts a Furnace on the Car and Uses the Ordinary Engine," NYT, Feb. 1, 1924 and "Big French Motor Magnate Talks on Gas," Drew Pearson, Boston Daily Globe, Dec. 14, 1924.
"Gasoline Powered Cars May Become Oddity in Germany," The Hartford Courant, May 29, 1936.
"25,000 French Cars, Trucks, Now Run on Charcoal," Chicago Tribune, April 3, 1941.
"Most of Europe's Autos Driven by Ersatz Fuel," Christian Science Monitor, June 12, 1941. (The same newspaper later published a 'how-to' article: "Did You Even Wonder How an Automobile Can Run on Charcoal?", Oct. 6, 1941
There was also interest in Italy:
"Gas-Driven Motor-Cars Fuel Derived From Charcoal," (News) FROM OUR OWN CORRESPONDENT. The Times Wednesday, Nov 22, 1933; pg. 13; Issue 46608; col B
This is a report from Rome about a gasogene machine running on charcoal derived from wood and fuel from “vegetable refuse or other normal waste materials.” It provides details about the cost, showing how much cheaper these fuels are.
"Charcoal Fuel For Cars Result Of Italian Experiment, 3,750 Miles For £3 (News) "FROM OUR ROME CORRESPONDENT. The Times Saturday, Sep 21, 1935; pg. 9; Issue 47175; col E
This is a good lengthy piece talking about how the Italians are trying to make themselves self-sufficient and to balance trade. An ‘open sports car’ was driven over 3000 miles around Europe and a breakdown is given of the costs – which were much less than for petrol. This is so successful that public transport is increasingly using charcoal and “that all vehicles used for passenger transport must be adapted for the consumption of charcoal fuel by December 31, 1937.”
This from New Zealand: "Best Woods Are Sought to Make Car Charcoal", The Hartford Courant, Nov. 17, 1940. The same paper has an article about Japan: "Jap Cars to Burn More Charcoal, Less Gasoline." July 7, 1940. In Australia it was announced that a charcoal powered car had made the 7000 mile trip from Perth to Sydney with the fuel costing $3.20 per 1000 miles. The Hartford Courant, Aug.12, 1942.
In 1944, students at Lehigh University built one: "Ration Free Automobile Uses Charcoal as Fuel," Christian Science Monitor, April 5, 1944.
Post Script:
Sadly, such sources led me to Project #738, which I will also now abandon to clear the decks for 2021. It was about - LOONEY GAS - an interesting subject I will leave it up to you to investigate. It is not, by the way, about gas that costs a loonie a litre, but rather about leaded gas that often caused people to go 'looney.' I should have covered it in my post about the history of Gasoline Stations.
Alas, as well, I am abandoning the subject of "bubble cars" which were the many tiny cars built in Europe because of fuel shortages during the war. A few year back, a collection of microcars were auctioned for over $8 million in an auction run by RM Auctions located close by in Chatham. Their story almost became another project. They have since partnered with Sotheby's to become RM Sotheby's. See also: "Tiny Bubbles, Causing a Buzz," Robbie Brown, NYT, Feb. 22, 2013.
Sunday, 20 December 2020
North of Long Tail
Lake Erie
Beautiful Photographs
George R. Stewart (1895 - 1980)
Pandemic Reading Project
The Pandemic
The Weather
Now For Some Non-Fiction
Travel
Names
University Politics
Sources:
Bret Harte, Houghton, 1931, reprinted, AMS Press, 1977.
Tuesday, 15 December 2020
Christopher Hitchens
Christopher Hitchens passed away on December 15, 2011. This year marks the ninth anniversary of his death and since there will be many remembrances next year, I thought I would present mine now. Had he lived, he would be almost 72 and I am sure would have remained as pugnacious as he appears in the picture above.
Some of the reasons why I admire him are better expressed by Larry McMurtry who wrote this about him in Walter Benjamin at the Dairy Queen:
“The descendants of the great readers I have mentioned are too often merely fluent know-it-alls, of whom Christopher Hitchens might be considered the exemplar. There he is, every week or month, in the Nation, Vanity Fair, the London Review of Books, writing about history, politics, books, public figures, virtually anything that comes down the freeways of our global culture. I personally have seen Christopher Hitchens in public debate while so weary or drunk or both that he can hardly have known whether he was even facing his audience, or whether there was an audience --and yet not a detail of his argument was dropped and not any of his long and well-turned sentences were slurred. His speech, like his writing, is precise, often brilliant, sometimes spellbinding, rarely inelegant; and yet one feels--as with many of his high-journalistic peers--that all this knowledge (or at least all this information) is not really reading-derived, but has been acquired more or less by osmosis, by rubbing elbows with his journalistic peers in Washington, London, New York, Paris, Delhi, Tehran, or wherever. I might note that this fluency is something few Americans seem to possess; perhaps it stems from admirable European secondary education. I might note too that it is mainly those high journalists who seem to command the steadily released energies of their Victorian counterparts, Bagehot, Macaulay, Saintsbury.” (p.123)
To be able to argue well while drunk may not be a skill you admire, but as one who does not do such a good job, even when sober, it is one that appeals to me. I am, by the way, rather good at drinking and much prefer it over arguing.
The abilities he displayed while arguing typically where employed in support of notions I also support. He was not a fan of religion as you will gather from the hint provided in this title: God Is Not Great. If you need a bigger hint, it is found in the not so subtle sub-title: How Religion Poisons Everything.
After receiving the cancerous death notice, he was asked near the end if it was likely that he would seek solace in religion. Here is his answer: "Mr. Hitchens discussed the possibility of a deathbed conversion, insisting that the odds were slim that he would admit the existence of God."“The entity making such a remark might be a raving, terrified person whose cancer has spread to the brain,” he told The Atlantic in August 2010. “I can’t guarantee that such an entity wouldn’t make such a ridiculous remark, but no one recognizable as myself would ever make such a remark.”
He was also a critic of what is termed "Islamofascism" and would have undoubtedly written (as I did) about the recent beheading of a French teacher and the murder of three churchgoers by Islamist terrorists. He defended Salman Rushdie who, you may remember, had to go into hiding and whose Japanese translator was murdered and his Norwegian publisher shot. This is what Hitchens wrote when asked about that fatwa:
When The Washington Post telephoned me at home on Valentine's Day 1989 to ask my opinion about the Ayatollah Khomeini's fatwa, I felt at once that here was something that completely committed me. It was, if I can phrase it like this, a matter of everything I hated versus everything I loved. In the hate column: dictatorship, religion, stupidity, demagogy, censorship, bullying and intimidation. In the love column: literature, irony, humor, the individual, and the defense of free expression. Plus, of course, friendship -- though I like to think my reaction would have been the same if I hadn't known Salman at all. To re-state the premise of the argument again: the theocratic head of a foreign despotism offers money in his own name in order to suborn the murder of a civilian citizen of another country, for the offence of writing a work of fiction. No more root-and-branch challenge to the values of the Enlightenment (on the bicentennial of the fall of the Bastille) or to the First Amendment to the Constitution, could be imagined. (p.268.)
Post Script:
In the "About This Blog" section of this blog I state the one of its purposes is to serve as a memory aid for me. By reading up on subjects and then writing down thoughts, I assumed, for example, that a year-or-two from now I might have a vague recollection of who Christopher Hitchens was. It is not working.
A few paragraphs into this post I had the thought that I might have written about Hitchens before. I have. Not only that, I quoted the same bit from Larry McMurtry! Well, it is a good bit and if I have any readers, they may have forgotten it as well. The post was about Mother Teresa, about whom Hitchens wrote a book: The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice.
The Bonus:
Since I provided the McMurtry quote twice, here is a new one. It is from Michael Kinsley and it is found in a review of God Is Not Great, in the New York Times, May 13, 2007:
His enemies would like to believe he [Hitchens] is a fraud. But he isn’t, as the very existence of his many enemies tends to prove. He is self-styled, to be sure, but no more so than many others in Washington — or even in New York or London — who are not nearly as good at it. He is a principled dissolute, with the courage of his dissolution: he enjoys smoking and drinking, and not just the reputation for smoking and drinking — although he enjoys that too. And through it all he is productive to an extent that seems like cheating: 23 books, pamphlets, collections and collaborations so far; a long and often heavily researched column every month in Vanity Fair; frequent fusillades in Slate and elsewhere; and speeches, debates and other public spectacles whenever offered.
The quotation about Hitchens unlikely deathbed conversion is also from the New York Times:
"Christopher Hitchens, Polemicist Who Slashed All, Freely, Dies at 62," by William Grimes, Dec. 16, 2011.
You can see and hear Hitch in action in many YouTube videos; e.g. interviews with Jon Stewart and Sean Hannity and an almost seven hour compilation.