Showing posts with label dog days. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dog days. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 August 2022

MIT Press

    Additional Aids for Autodidacts


    My last post about University Presses was provided back in June (see: "Wolverines, Spartans and Books.") Before that, I offered you entertaining entries which were designed for lone wolf learners who wish to tackle tough subjects from their recliners.  For example, in early 2019 I helped you make some "Intellectual Resolutions" by suggesting that you could bone up on weighty subjects by reading the slim books in the "Very Short Introduction...series produced by Oxford University Press, or the even shorter ones in the "30 Second Books" offered by Ivy Press. That was followed during the dog days of August by "More Aids for Autodidacts" which discusses Yale's "Why X Matters Series" and the "Little Histories" which will make you appear to know a lot. Now you will learn about another university press series which offers a short cut to enlightenment.


                                          Essential Knowledge Series



  
   I suppose one could quibble a bit about what constitutes "Essential Knowledge", but I will not, since"MIT" stands for the "Massachusetts Institute of Technology" and the folks typically found there are much more knowledgeable than I. This is what they say about this series:

The MIT Press Essential Knowledge series offers accessible, concise, beautifully produced books on topics of current interest. Written by leading thinkers, the books in this series deliver expert overviews of subjects that range from the cultural and the historical to the scientific and the technical. In today's era of instant information gratification, we have ready access to opinions, rationalizations, and superficial descriptions. Much harder to come by is the foundational knowledge that informs a principled understanding of the world. Essential Knowledge books fill that need. Synthesizing specialized subject matter for nonspecialists and engaging critical topics through fundamentals, each of these compact volumes offers readers a point of access to complex ideas.’


  Ninety-two titles are currently listed in categories ranging from Architecture to Technology. Two are found under "History" and they are: Hunting: A Cultural History and Nuclear Weapons. There are thirteen related to "Political Science." Some are highly topical: 


Here are some other samples: 

Whiteness, by Martin Lund.
"The socially constructed phenomenon of whiteness: how it was created, how it changes, and how it protects and privileges people who are perceived as white.
"This volume in the MIT Press Essential Knowledge series examines the socially constructed phenomenon of whiteness, tracing its creation, its changing formation, and its power to privilege and protect people who are perceived as white. Whiteness, author Martin Lund explains, is not one single idea but a shifting, overarching category, a flexible cluster of historically, culturally, and geographically contingent ideals and standards that enable systems of hierarchical classification. Lund discusses words used to talk about whiteness, from white privilege to white fragility; the intersections of whiteness with race, class, and gender; whiteness in popular culture; and such ideas as “colorblindness” and “reverse racism,” which, he argues, actually uphold whiteness."

Hate Speech, by Caitlin Ring Carlson.
"Hate speech can happen anywhere—in Charlottesville, Virginia, where young men in khakis shouted, “Jews will not replace us”; in Myanmar, where the military used Facebook to target the Muslim Rohingya; in Capetown, South Africa, where a pastor called on ISIS to rid South Africa of the "homosexual curse.” In person or online, people wield language to attack others for their race, national origin, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, disability, or other aspects of identity. This volume in the MIT Press Essential Knowledge series examines hate speech: what it is, and is not; its history; and efforts to address it.
Author Caitlin Ring Carlson, an expert in communication and mass media, defines hate speech as any expression—spoken words, images, or symbols—that seeks to malign people for their immutable characteristics. Hate speech is not synonymous with offensive speech—saying that you do not like someone does not constitute hate speech—or hate crimes, which are criminal acts motivated by prejudice. Hate speech traumatizes victims and degrades societies that condone it. Carlson investigates legal approaches taken by the EU, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Japan, South Africa, and the United States, with a detailed discussion of how the U.S. addresses, and in most cases, allows, hate speech. She explores recent hate speech controversies, and suggests ways that governments, colleges, media organizations, and other organizations can limit the spread of hate speech."
   
   As you will see from the samples I have chosen, the books in this series offer "Essential Knowledge" about "topics of current interest." Some of them may prove to be more ephemeral than essential, but they will be useful nonetheless. 

Sources:
  The books in the MIT "Essential Knowledge" series can be found here.
   MIT publishes many other books. See mitpress.mit.edu. 
   One topic included is "Content", which seems like a rather amorphous subject to me. To see what the author is up to, look at this essay by her which is adapted from Content, by Kate Eichhorn: " "Content" Erases Wall Between Fact & Fiction," Kate Eichhorn, Public Books..." 8/2/22. 



The Bonus: 
   I mentioned "dog days" above, which has more to do with astronomy than with dogs panting in the hot sun. See: "Here's Why We Call This Time of Year the 'Dog Days' of Summer," Becky Little, National Geographic, July 16, 2021.
"These punishingly hot summer days get their name from an ancient belief about the brightest star in the sky—not from dogs’ tendency to laze around in the heat."

Thursday, 31 January 2019

The Dead of Winter


   Once again I will bring up the subject of weather, something we all do when we are having a discussion and have little to say; an "ice breaker" of sorts. The title of the post is an appropriate one since it is very cold and the landscape is devoid of living things. I thought the "dead of winter" was the coldest part, but remembered that Canada's national meteorologist and one-man Farmer's Almanac defines it more optimistically as the date when there "is more winter behind than ahead of us." In this neck of Canada, the day is around Jan. 23rd, but we are still a long way from the "dog days of summer." One has to remember that there are several weeks to go before we enter "our severest winter commonly called spring."

Source: 

   The national weatherman is Dave Phillips and for more see: "Winter is Leaving, For Some of Us, Climatologist Says," The Canadian Press, Jan. 13, 2017.
   The really good definition for the Canadian spring is by Cowper and it is the real reason for this post since otherwise I would have forgotten it when the sleet is falling on MAY TWO FOUR. I didn't find the quote in something written by Cowper, but it is in a book written by Edwin Way Teale: Springtime in Britain. 

Post Script:

   As an old-timer I still think in Fahrenheit and find it preferable not simply because I am old.  If I was talking to my sisters in Florida today where it is about 70F I could brag that it is just about 70 degrees cooler here. In Celsius there would be only a 38 degree difference. If they happen to call me during those few days in July when it gets into the 70s, I can say so. There is no Celsius equivalent. If you say it is going to be in the 20s Celsius the temperature could be anywhere from 68 to 84. The Celsius teens are even worse. Although no one wants to agree with the Yanks these days, perhaps they were correct to keep the old method.
   I don't usually provide sources for the stuff found in the Post Script section, since the stuff usually consists of my thoughts for which there is usually little support. But, with just a little bit of searching I learned that my views may not be as unreasonable and antiquated as I thought. See: "Fahrenheit vs. Celsius: Did the U.S. Get it Right After All?" Daniel Faris, zmescience.com, Nov. 20, 2017
"Fahrenheit is also more precise. The ambient temperature on most of the inhabited world ranges from -20 degrees Fahrenheit to 110 degrees Fahrenheit — a 130-degree range. On the Celsius scale, that range is from -28.8 degrees to 43.3 degrees — a 72.1-degree range. This means that you can get a more exact measurement of the air temperature using Fahrenheit because it uses almost twice the scale."
  As far as other weights and measures go, I am not bothered, but my very long drives in golf still travel in yards and my weight is being gained in pounds. Don't forget, however, that many people were bothered and changes such as these can have unintended consequences.
"Remember the Metric Martyrs? The fishmonger and greengrocer in Camelford, the market trader in Hackney, the greengrocer in Sunderland, all convicted in the early 2000s for using imperial scales and labelling? It was one of the darkest times for the EU’s reputation in Britain. If we’re looking for specific reasons why so many people voted Leave, it’s worth contemplating the lingering ill-feeling left by those small acts of bureaucratic bullying, when the ‘little guy’ going about his daily business was squashed and criminalised by the rigid mechanics of Council Directive 80/181/EEC, stipulating the use of metric measurements, incorporated into English law in January 2000."
"The Original Metric Martyrs Are Still Waiting for a Royal Pardon: Their Story Became a Turning Point in Britain’s Relationship With the EU. It Isn’t Over Yet," Ysenda Maxtone Graham Spectator - July 9, 2016.