Anger Management

 "You're A Loser!" - "No, You're A Loser!" - We Are All Losers Now

  That represents the low level of discourse these days and whataboutism abounds. Everyone agrees that everyone is angry and everyone seems on the verge of shouting, at whatever network they are watching - "I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!"

 Tempers High 

   Proof of the madness has been offered and that is the reason I now provide a short post about the current affairs we all try to ignore. The illustration above "shows the evolution of anger in policy-related congressional floor speeches since 1874. Anger rises sharply after the mid-2010s in both the House and Senate and reaches its highest level in the 2020s." Another set of results "documents a sharp rise in anger in political discourse, with anger emerging as the dominant emotion among citizens, voters, and policymakers alike." This study suggests that "American politics is angrier than ever."

   I am choosing not to say more because I am more depressed than angry. Those wishing to investigate the anger should read the following article, and the study on which it is based:

  "Quantifying Anger in American Politics: The Country is Awash in Indignation," The Economist, Aug. 30, 2026.

  The study: "The Rise of Anger: Emotions and Policy Views," Eve Davoine, et al. can be found here and the abstract is provided:

Abstract:

  "In this paper, we document the rise of anger in U.S. political communication and study its effects on policy views. We combine online and offline data, including the full record of congressional floor speeches since the 1870s, tweets from members of Congress, tweets from voters matched to electoral registries, campaign speeches, and Reddit comments. Anger in U.S. congressional speeches has risen sharply in the last decade, reaching its highest level in a century and a half. In voter tweets, the share of policy-related sentences expressing anger rises 35% between 2013 and 2025. In tweets by members of Congress, the angry-sentence share rises by 72%. Angry tweets by members of Congress or by voters receive around 60% more retweets relative to tweets with no emotion. Our two experiments show that negative emotions increase support for protectionism, restrictive immigration policies, and redistribution. Positive emotions mainly improve perceptions and reduce support for populism. Anger also changes climate policy views, while fear has no detectable effect. Building on the ACTORC framework of Bordalo et al. ( 2026 ), our model shows how emotions direct attention toward different features of policy problems. Overall, emotions shape both engagement and policy views."

The entire report is available as a pdf and it consists of 186 pages!

Postscript:
In Canada it seems that we are just as angry, but perhaps a bit less mad.