Tuesday, 29 June 2021

Sobriety May Be Overrated

 Ammo for Alkies

  
    I read a book review this morning that provides me with an opportunity to break free from a minor case of "blogger's block" which, like many cases of "writer's block", is symptomatic of nothing more than nice summer weather. This will be kept short and I will make clear that the sage wisdom offered is meant for those who: 1) prefer not to be sober; 2) like to consume alcoholic beverages; 3) need a better rationale for doing so; 4) need one quickly for the approaching holiday and 5) want to feel less guilty when leaving the LCBO store or pub. 

  If you incline toward intoxication, you would have been intrigued, as I was, by the title of a review that reads: "A History of Getting Hammered, and Why Some of Us Should Keep Doing It," by Zoe Lescaze, New York Times, June 19, 2021. I realize that those of you on the far right side of things, think that the New York Times is not to be trusted, so I will quickly add that the book under review was written by a university professor. I suppose that doesn't help much for those of you in that category, but I will quickly add again, for my Canadian readers, the fact that the professor resides at a respected Canadian university (UBC.) The title of the book is, for us boozers, as compelling as the title of the review; it is: Drunk: How We Slippped, Danced and Stumbled Our Way to Civilization.  The author is Professor Edward Slingerland and he is a Distinguished University Scholar, whose skills are appreciated in different departments, even in different faculties. He is also a PHILOSOPHER, so if you buy this book, you will be looking at an academic treatise that helps you justify your alcohol consumption, plus you will be the only one at the beach not reading a book by James PATTERSON.
  

   Happy hour approaches, so I will now turn this over to the reviewers and sources, and highlight the bits that you need if you are drinking too much and don't have time to actually read the book. 

   After noting that, even Frederick the Great of Prussia recognized "that beer was a uniquely powerful bonding agent, and key to morale,"the reviewer, Ms Lescaze, goes on to offer the following points:
For thousands of years cultures around the world have “implicitly understood that the sober, rational, calculating individual mind is a barrier to social trust,” Edward Slingerland writes in “Drunk: How We Sipped, Danced, and Stumbled Our Way to Civilization,” an effervescent new study that’s equal parts anthropology, psychology and evolutionary biology. Drawing on recent experiments, Neolithic burials, eclectic myths and global literature, Slingerland teases out the evolutionary advantages and enduring benefits of getting blitzed. It’s a rowdy banquet of a book in which the ancient Roman historian Tacitus, Lord Byron, Timothy Leary, George Washington, the Chinese poet Tao Yuanming and many others toast the merits of drowning Apollonian reason in Dionysian abandon..."
"For our ancestors, inebriation was especially essential, “a robust and elegant response to the challenges of getting a selfish, suspicious, narrowly goal-oriented primate to loosen up and connect with strangers.” This is why hunter-gatherers likely began producing beer and wine before bread...."
“It is no accident that, in the brutal competition of cultural groups from which civilizations emerged, it is the drinkers, smokers and trippers who emerged triumphant,” Slingerland writes: Human society would not exist without ample lubrication..."

Disclaimer Alert

   I realize it is a little late and I should have provided this warning at the beginning.  But, in my defence, I only realized that such a warning is now required, when I saw one at the beginning of a CBC report about an upcoming quilting convention in Moose Jaw.  I did not risk reading on, in that case and am not sure what was upsetting, or who was being offended.  Perhaps the quilters simply forgot to ask the Indigenous for permission to temporarily occupy their space. 
   I hope you have not been made anxious or traumatized  by what has been written here so far, but I suggest you have a drink if you want to continue.

An Additional Warning

   Everyone now is rather 'touchy' and as a society we are tending toward temperance, so to protect myself and Professor Slingerland from those such as the MADD people, it should be noted that excessive alcohol consumption has been associated with some health concerns. Even my drinking buddies know that and practice moderation in some matters and generally avoid butter on their toast and salt on their eggs. The professor acknowledges this issue:
Slingerland is adamant that chemically induced communion is just as valuable (and perhaps particularly necessary) in modern times, but he does address alcohol’s more obvious medical and economic costs, the devastating effects of addiction and the subtle, pernicious ways in which drinking can alienate and exclude outsiders. Some readers might find the treatment cursory given the gravity of these issues, but Slingerland simply argues that they have been well documented, whereas serious scholarly work on the value of intoxication is surprisingly scant. As a result, poor alcohol stands “defenseless” against doctors and government policymakers who paint it as pure vice. Slingerland takes up the cause with all the chivalry of a knight-errant, and his infectious passion makes this book a romp as well as a refreshingly erudite rejoinder to the prevailing wisdom.

   Additional information is provided by the publishers, Hachette Book Group, where this blurb is found: 
A "entertaining and enlightening" deep dive into the alcohol-soaked origins of civilization—and the evolutionary roots of humanity’s appetite for intoxication. (Daniel E. Lieberman, author of Exercised)

  Another review is found in the New Scientist and this is found in it:
Slingerland, a philosopher at the University of British Columbia in Canada, has a novel thesis, arguing that by causing humans “to become, at least temporarily, more creative, cultural, and communal… intoxicants provided the spark that allowed us to form truly large-scale groups”. In short, without them, civilisation might not have been possible.
See: "Drunk Review: Could Alcohol-induced Creativity Be Key to Civilisation?" June 2, 2021.

   See also the review in the New York Journal of Books:
Slingerhand does not defend alcohol, but he does point out that it has positive benefits from the past to the present. Alcohol serves as a disinfectant (including for water) and as an anti-parasite medicine, including anti-fungal protection.
“Drunken words are spoken straight from the heart” and Slingerhand devotes much space to the many different dimensions of social drinking. “Sobriety diminishes, discriminates, and says no; drunkenness expands, unites, and says yes.” “The political function of alcohol is practical as well as symbolic.”

   For more, go directly to:
The Wikipedia entry for Professor Slingerland.
The website for the book:  

The Bonus:
Professor Slingerland has authored other works including: Tying Not To Try. Perhaps he is a better professor than some found on the other side of campus. Our granddaughter is enrolled at UBC. Maybe I will encourage her to stroll over there when an actual visit is allowed. 
In Trying Not To Try, Edward Slingerland explains why we find spontaneity so elusive, and shows how early Chinese thought points the way to happier, more authentic lives. We’ve long been told that the way to achieve our goals is through careful reasoning and conscious effort. But recent research suggests that many aspects of a satisfying life, like happiness and spontaneity, are best pursued indirectly. The early Chinese philosophers knew this, and they wrote extensively about an effortless way of being in the world, which they called wu-wei (ooo-way). They believed it was the source of all success in life, and they developed various strategies for getting it and hanging on to it.


Monday, 14 June 2021

Warehouses

 

Good News or Bad?

   Good news is rather rare these days, but some has appeared in our local region. There have been many positive headlines about the construction of new warehouses and the potential arrival of Amazon in our area. Here is one of them along with a few opening sentences:
"A Windfall and a Shakeup; An Amazon Centre Would Bring Money and Force Retailers to 'Up Their Game'," Norman De Bono, The London Free Press, May 28, 2021.
An Amazon packaging and distribution centre landing on London's doorstep would be an immediate windfall for the local economy, say retail industry observers.
The building of what may be a massive, e-commerce hub, buying a host of support services, generating tax revenue and paying workers wages all would be an injection of cash locally.
But its long-term impact on the retail sector, as it pushes consumers even faster into the e-commerce economy, will bear watching as it may hurt brick-and mortar shops slower to embrace e-commerce.

Questions could be asked about this 'windfall' and how tight our embrace of e-commerce and Amazon should be, but I am more concerned about this headline: 'Amazon Plans to Expand Southwestern Ontario Footprint with 2 London Warehouses: The Company Says There, Will Be 200 Warehouse Jobs Available, 130 Delivery Drivers." (CBC News, May 27, 2021.) The jobs may be good and the 'windfall' may last, but surely the Footprint will last even longer and be difficult to erase. 

The 403

   The news is even more euphoric in The Brantford Expositor. The reasons for that are easily spotted as one drives from London to Hamilton. You may recall that before the 403 was completed the drive took longer, but was certainly more scenic. On the east side of Brantford the fields are now full of warehouses and it is likely the ones between Woodstock and Brantford will be as well.  Soon we may dread the drive along the 403, just as we much as we dread seeing the HTTP 404 message on our computer, as a symbol of what has been lost.

   My objection is not an aesthetic one, it is agricultural in nature. Should prime agricultural land, which is a rare commodity in Ontario, be turned over for such a purpose? Would we not be better off growing crops, rather than constructing warehouses? And, given what has been made obvious by the pandemic, wouldn't we be better off making things ourselves locally rather than distributing goods made by others far away?

Sources: 
   I will not attempt to skew them, in favour of my position. If you want to read some positive articles you can start with The Brantford Expositor. For example: "New Warehouse Centre Backed by City Council," Oct. 7, 2020 and "Growth in Warehouse Industry Continues," where it is noted that:  In the county, warehousing and distribution employs approximately 1,400 people and represents about five per cent of all business in Brant. By way of comparison, agriculture represents 13 per cent, retail nine per cent and manufacturing seven per cent. (April 13, 2021.) I did note at the end of one article where it was mentioned that "Supply Chain Management" was being taught in support of such developments that:  “It is generally accepted that global supply chains have reduced costs and increase the range of options available to businesses and consumers alike. However, businesses, academics and policymakers have tended to underplay the risks associated with this process of globalization.”
There is also one article to be found about some Indigenous opposition: "Activists Support Protecting Land for Future Generations," TBE, May 8, 2021.

   For a recent article from the United States, questioning the covering of the land with warehouses see:
"A New Crop in Pennsylvania: Warehouses: Huge facilities have sprouted up in and around the Lehigh Valley, fueled by the astonishing growth of e-commerce. Some residents say the area’s landscape and long-term economic health could be threatened.
Michael Corkery - May 26., 2021, The New York Times. 
“They are coming here and putting up shiny new warehouses and erasing pieces of history,” said Juli Winkler, whose ancestors are buried in the Maxatawny cemetery. “Who knows if these big buildings will even be useful in 50 years.”
Developers are very confident in the industry’s growth, however, particularly after the pandemic. Big warehouse companies like Prologis and Duke Realty are investing billions in local properties. Many of the warehouses are being built before tenants have signed up, making some wonder whether there is a bubble and if some of these giant buildings will ever be filled.
“People are calling it warehouse fatigue,” said Dr. Christopher R. Amato, a member of the regional planning commission. “It feels like we are just being inundated.”
   See this site, presented by the Ontario Federation of Agriculture: Prevent Ontario's Food and Farms From Disappearing Forever. 

"Food Growers Issue Urgent Plea to Preserve Ontario's Shrinking Farmland Base," Doug Schmidt,  Windsor Star, May 28, 2021  

Amazon is Everywhere: On June 11, this article is found in the Times Colonist - "Amazon Rumours Continue to Swirl in Langford and Sidney," by Darren Kloster.




The Bonus:
  Jeff Bezos is taking a trip on July 20 to the edge of space. Someone just paid $28 Million to have a seat next to him for the ride, which will take less than 28 minutes. 

Sunday, 13 June 2021

Marine Mucilage in the Sea of Marmara

 


Sea Snot


   Having recently offered you an acronym for our time (S.W.I.N.E.), I provide above a term for our time. It floated to the top in some headlines over the last few weeks. It is unfortunate that the Students Wildly Indignant About Nearly Everything are not more concerned about subjects like Sea Snot. Apparently included within their curriculum for condemnation are only those topics related to identity, race and gender. Or perhaps it is just that such environmental issues are too distressing to discuss and might trigger gloomy thoughts about our future. (I have noticed, by the way, that the CBC now prefaces, even the most benign story with this sentence: WARNING: This story contains details some readers may find distressing.) Consider that before you continue on.

   I was distressed during the first week of June to read about the catastrophe in Sri Lanka, which I always thought would be a highly desirable destination, except for the identity and racial problems, but now the beaches certainly are best avoided. All you need to know is found in the title of this article from The Guardian on June 4: Sri Lankans Face Up To 'Unmeasurable Cost' of Cargo Ship Disaster: Fishing Communities Fear for the Future As Oil, Plastic and Toxic Chemicals Devastate Ecosystem. Five days later, more marine pollution is spotted farther to the East, in the Sea of Marmara. I chose to show you the map rather than the Snot.

   Here is the headline which includes the phrase with which we are likely to become more familiar: "Turkey Launches Massive Effort to Vacuum up Thick Layer of 'Sea Snot' Choking Its Coast," Washington Post, June 9, 2021. Here are some details:

Thick layers of the viscous, slimy mucus colloquially known as “sea snot” have been wreaking havoc along Turkey’s coastline for months, choking harbors and clogging up fishermen’s nets while suffocating marine life. Scientists say that untreated sewage, agricultural runoff and other forms of pollution are responsible for the phenomenon, but that warming water temperatures caused by climate change appear to be making it even worse. The unappetizing muck has become a source of national embarrassment and rising anger. On Tuesday, Erdoğan vowed to designate the Sea of Marmara, which is between the Black and Aegean Seas, as a conservation area. Meanwhile, government officials launched a massive cleanup operation, using tanker trucks with suction hoses that park along the shoreline and effectively act as giant vacuum cleaners. Similar methods have been used to remove toxic blue-green algae from waterways in Florida.

   Although the phrase was new to me, I was surprised that Wikipedia all ready has an entry and not under a more pleasant euphemism. I did go searching, however, to find the first use of the odious words together and found them in this article from 2007, which locates the pollution closer to home. Given that it is the first use that I could find and since this reference is not found in the Wikipedia entry, here it is along with the first few paragraphs.

   "Say Hello to Sea Snot," Abram Katz, New Haven Register, August 19, 2007:
Aug. 19--DIDYMO is heading this way like a belligerent life force from a different planet. It clogs fast-moving, cold rivers with mats of material that literally wipe out the bottom of the food chain. Streams once rich with species of fish, plants and other organisms become aquatic deserts.
No one knows how to stop it.
The culprit, Didymosphenia geminata, is not from another world or even a different country. Didymo has been here for ages.
Lately, it has been expanding its range and changing its preferences for low-temperature, nutrient-poor, water. Biologists fear that other micro-organisms could make similar changes.
Meanwhile, didymo has been found in the northern reaches of the Connecticut River, in Vermont. A boater found a strange clump on a rock and brought it to local biologists for identification. Didymo had arrived.
There's no way to stop it, or even slow it down, biologists said.
So get ready for what is, colloquially, but incorrectly, called "sea snot."

The Bonus: 
   I doubt if you need more snot sources so I will skip to the bonus and provide you with an apercu, since I haven't offered one in a while - Apercu #3. It comes in the form of a rather tasteless bon mot offered by the British footballer, George Best. Warning - If you are a member of the herd of S.WI.N.E. it will likely put your knickers in a knot.

Mr. Best apparently offered this comment about his life: "I spent most of my money on women and drink. I wasted the rest."
Once again, doing due diligence on your behalf, I found this variant in the Wikipedia entry for Best: When asked what happened to the money he had earned, Best quipped: "I spent a lot of money on booze, birds (women) and fast cars. The rest I just squandered."
Among other inappropriate utterances by him, one finds:
"I used to go missing a lot -- Miss Canada, Miss United Kingdom, Miss World..."
"In 1969 I gave up women and alcohol. It was the worst 20 minutes of my life."
Ta-da!

Mission Blue - an organization that is attempting to do something for our oceans.
Mission Blue inspires action to explore and protect the ocean. Led by legendary oceanographer Dr. Sylvia Earle, Mission Blue is uniting a global coalition to inspire an upwelling of public awareness, access and support for a worldwide network of marine protected areas – Hope Spots.
   


Friday, 4 June 2021

A Murder of Crows

 


The Crows of Vancouver

   We have children living in Vancouver and when visiting them we always notice the crows. They are seen on the lawns and the picture above taken at one son's house, could have been duplicated at the other's. They are even more noticeable at the end of the day when thousands of them, like many other commuters, head for the suburbs. In the crows'  case, the destination is an office park in Burnaby where they will perch and poop. 


   We have been unable to visit because of the pandemic and when we were last there we had to leave prematurely because of the pandemic. I thought of the crows because of a recent article profiling Mr. Fidel Eligan, an immigrant from the Philippines, whose job it is to clean up after the crows. He is a fine fellow who gets up very early to ride his bike to Burnaby where, "the slight senior dons a hazmat suit, straps a 15-kilogram tank to his wiry back and spends hours spraying the lobbies, hallways and staircases his company is subcontracted to clean." Because of the pandemic, Mr. Eligan has been unable to visit his family back in the Philippines so "he has opted to take on an overtime shift disinfecting the buildings in the same office park each weekend." He remarks that "Maybe no crow, maybe me, no work," he says with a chuckle on a recent morning. "I enjoy the crows." The last sentence in the article is this one: "I'm always happy," he says of his life." We should all be so happy. 
   You may have read the article and know about the crows of Vancouver. If not, I will provide some good sources about them below. The subject will now change to the title - The Murder of Crows.

Nouns of Assemblage or Terms of Venery

   Oddly enough, there is not one term to refer to for a collection or group of things. The two above are often used along with, "Nouns of Multitude", "Group Terms" or "Collective Nouns", the last of which also has a more specific grammatical meaning. The need for such terms was noticed long ago and many of them were developed by those out hunting who required words for their descriptions. What does one call a large ???? of pheasants. That is how 'murder' came to be applied to crows, 'bouquet' to pheasants and 'skulk' to foxes. To learn more about all of this, turn to An Exaltation of Larks or, The Venereal Game by James Lipton. Venereal terms in this instance, generally refer to hunting and not what you are thinking. 

   Apart from the real 'nouns of assemblage', etc., there are imaginary ones invented by people such as you. The ones related to lawyers are likely to be unprintable in this family-friendly blog, but here are a few for those in the medical profession: "A Brace of Orthopedists", "A Rash of Dermatologists", "A Pile of Proctologists", and "A Smear of Gynecologists". One could go on, for example: "A Flush of Plumbers," "A Piddle of Puppies," "A Wince of Dentists" or A Column of Accountants." Assemble your own or invite a 'Batch of Buddies' or 'Circle of Crones' over to play a game which involves the creation of colourful venereal terms. 

Sources:
   For the article about Mr. Eligan and the Burnaby crows see: "How Do You Clean Up After a Murder of Crows," Mike Hager, The Globe and Mail, April, 5, 2021. A related video is found on YouTube.
   For additional information about the Vancouver roosts see:
   There are also roosts closer to home. For example:
"A Night Spent With Woodstock's Crow Man," Chatham Daily News, Tara Bowie.
It's Not Just Your Imagination: Why a Murder of 10,000 Crows Takes Over Ottawa in the Winter," PostMedia News, Jan.19, 2017.
  The always interesting Atlas Obscura contains a good piece: "An Ostentation of Peacocks, and Other Flowery Ways Medieval Hunters Grouped Birds," Eric Grundhauser, Nov. 24, 2015. 
   For another good article, with pictures and examples: "Collective Nouns for Birds: Why We Call It a Murder of Crows, Murmuration of Starlings and a Conspiracy of Ravens?" Paula Lester, Country Life, Jan. 13, 2020. 

For books, in addition to An Exaltation of Larks see:
A Conspiracy of Ravens: A Compendium of Collective Nouns for Birds, Bill Odie.
A Charm of Goldfinches and Other Wild Gatherings: Quirky Collective Nouns of the Animal Kingdom, Matt Sewell.
A Murmuration of Starlings, Steve Palin.
and
 A Barrel of Monkeys: A Compendium of Collective Nouns For Animals. (Like The Conspiracy of Ravens, this one was assembled by the Bodleian Library.)