Saturday, 31 December 2022

Happy New Year!

 


When I posted my last post, I happened to notice that it was the 99th one for 2022. That is not a cause for celebration since when I started blogging, my goal was a post a day. Even though I know that Georges Simenon wrote a lot (and fooled around even more), I know now that my goal cannot be reached, even though I do no fooling around. But, I will do this quick 100th one because that does seem better than 99. I might have been able to rattle off a few more, but the neighbours just invited us over for a drink. Among my resolutions will be one to lower my aspirations rather than increase my output, which means that it is one resolution I am likely to keep.

Have a good new year. 

Watch Your Mouth!!

 


   Six years ago in late December I began a post that stumbled into the new year and in it I warned that the language police were coming. I suggested that you needed to "Be Careful About What You Say" and even about "What You Sing." I also indicated that "Name Calling" would be canceled and that the Moniker Monitors would change the name of your alma mater. All of this valuable information was cleverly concealed under the mystifying title - "This is NOT About Mariah Carey." Many years have passed, but if you click on that link, you can be among the very few who have read it. 

We Will Begin With the Benign



   For many years Lake Superior State University has offered lists of words which should be banned. It is a semi-serious endeavour I support since it suggests eliminating words for linguistic/grammatical reasons, not because of a Directive from the DEI Department. Here are the top ten for this year and this is the opening paragraph:

Stop resorting to imprecise, trite, and meaningless words and terms of seeming convenience! You’re taking the lazy way out and only confusing matters by over-relying on inexact, stale, and inane communication!

The TOP Ten:
1.GOAT
2. Inflection Point
3. Quiet Quitting
4. Gaslighting
5. Moving Forward
6. Amazing
7. Does That Make Sense?
8. Irregardless
9 . Absolutely
10. It Is What It Is
For a full explanation go here: Lake Superior State University

For comparison, here is the list from 2022:
1. Wait, what?
2. No worries
3. At the end of the day [this one has made other lists and is still with us.]
4. That being said
5. Asking for a friend
6. Circle back
7. Deep dive
8. New normal
9. You’re on mute
10. Supply chain
[My suggestions for the next list: "speaks to", "unpack" (except when applied to luggage) and "intersections" (except when referring to streets.)

The Stanford Situation

  Elite institutions are more concerned about the words relating to identity than grammar. Stanford administrators have worked hard on the Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative (EHLI). To access the website for EHLI, one has to have a Stanford logon, but the rationale behind it is described here: "Introducing the Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative Website." I found some of the words on the list, listed elsewhere and here are some of them, so you will know how to talk in 2023:

Among the verboten words cited on the "Ableist" master list along with the preferred substitutes are:
"addict," to be replaced with "person with a substance use disorder";
"addicted," to be replaced with "devoted";
"blind study," to be replaced with "masked study"; and
"walk-in," to be replaced with "open office."

Among the verboten words cited on the "Culturally Appropriative" master list along with the preferred substitutes are:
"Brave," not to be replaced but to be dropped from use altogether;
"chief," to be replaced with "the person's name"; and
"tribe," to be replaced with "friends, network, family, support system."

Among the verboten words cited on the "Gender-Based" master list along with the preferred substitutes are:
"'preferred' pronouns," to be replaced by pronouns — since "the word 'preferred' suggests that non-binary gender identity is a choice and a preference";
"ballsy," to be replaced with "bold";
"gentlemen," to be replaced with "everyone";
"he," to be replaced with "person's name of 'they'";
"seminal," to be replaced by "leading, groundbreaking," and
"tranny," to be replaced by "non-gendering conforming folk."

Among the verboten words cited on the "Imprecise Language" master list along with the preferred substitutes are:
"American," to be replaced with "US Citizen" — since this term insinuates "that the US is the most important country in the Americas"; and
"straight," to be replaced with "heterosexual."
Among the verboten words cited on the "Institutionalized Racism" master list along with the preferred substitutes are:
"black hat," to be replaced with "unethical hacker";
"blackballed," to be replaced with "banned, denied";
"gangbusters," to be replaced with "very successful";
"master (v)," to be replaced with "become adept in";
"master list," to be replaced with "list of record"; and
"white paper," to be replaced with "position paper."

   Stanford won (indirectly) a Sidney Award for this effort. The Sidney Awards are awarded by David Brooks of the NYT for good "long-form journalism." They honour Sidney Hook and one of the purposes of the award is to publicize good articles which is what I am doing here. Stanford didn't actually win the Sidney, Ginerva Davis did for writing about Stanford. The essay is found in Palladium magazine and the title of it is - "Stanford's War on Social Life." Stanford has strong allies in the war and their administrative troops are much like others elsewhere. Ms Davis writes:

“Since 2013, Stanford’s administration has executed a top-to-bottom destruction of student social life. Driven by a fear of uncontrollable student spontaneity and a desire to enforce equity on campus, a growing administrative bureaucracy has destroyed almost all of Stanford’s distinctive student culture.”

Even the WWE Is Awake

    World Wrestling Entertainment has suggested that announcers need to be more refined and eliminate certain words. I found some examples in an article that may be (one hopes) a satirical one. Two examples:

Banned term: Western Lariat. Reason: The word “Western” shows implicit bias toward eurocentric value systems and colonialism. Suggested replacement: “Decolonized Lariat.”
Banned term: Camel Clutch. Reason: It implies violence against animals, and reinforces negative stereotypes about the Middle East. Suggested replacement: “The Humble Maker.”

I don't have time on New Year's Eve to investigate this, but I did quickly find this article in WRESTLETALK: "FULL LIST OF BANNED WORDS IN WWE" (UPDATED). Among the words:
War
Interesting
The Business
Feud
Fans
Crazy
Interesting (?), but I am not sure this is all legitimate, but it is very difficult to distinguish between parody and reality these days.

Progress to Report


  Almost a decade ago, those associated with the Liverpool Football Club were given language guidelines and words like the ones above were not to be uttered. Looking at it, one can say that some progress has been made and it is likely that now even hooligans don't say such things. It is predicted here that "hooligans" will soon be eliminated.
("Kick It Out Chairman Welcomes List of 'Unacceptable' Words Issued by Liverpool to Staff: Words Such as "Princess" and Phrases Like "Don't Be A Woman" Are Included in the Guide Issued By the Reds," Independent, July 31, 2013.)

The Bonus: 
When I referred above to "Begin With the Benign", you probably thought of the song "Begin the Beguine" which was written by Cole Porter. If you don't know what "beguine" means, here is the answer: 
The beguine (/bəˈɡiːn/ bə-GHEEN)[1] is a dance and music form, similar to a slow rhumba. It was popular in the 1930s, coming from the islands of Guadeloupe and Martinique, where, in the local Antillean Creole language, beke or begue means a White man while beguine is the female form. It is a combination of Latin folk dance and French ballroom dance, and is a spirited yet slow, close dance with a roll of the hips, a movement inherited from rhumba.

If you would like to listen and dance to "Begin the Beguine" on this New Year's Eve, here is a version performed by Artie Shaw. 

Last of the CanCon

   The two posts before this one contained Canadian content and this one will as well. Consider them, like my year-end monetary donations, to be tokens of gesture to our government. That this is important Canadian content will be obvious in that it was noticed in the United States. It is also the case that this content will still be relevant in the new year.

Mastriano in the Maritimes

   I should be reluctant to tackle this subject since Senator Mastriano was a career military officer who reached the rank of colonel and taught at the U.S. Army War College in the state of Pennsylvania where he is a senator. My rank was much lower and I left the service prematurely. Dr. Mastriano also had a successful academic career, during which he obtained four masters degrees and one doctorate. My academic career was far longer than his, but I fell far short of his accomplishments. To make up for my educational shortcomings I will, as usual, supply sources from the more credible.

   Senator Mastriano was the recent Republican candidate for governor in the neighbouring state of Pennsylvania. He lost, although 2,238,477 people voted for him. He would probably dispute that number, as he disputed the numbers associated with the recent presidential election which he thought was stolen. He was endorsed by the real president pictured above. Mastriano is described as a right-wing Christian nationalist and worse, or perhaps better, if you think as he does. For more, see Doug Mastriano's Wikipedia entry.

   We will now move to the Maritimes. That is where Dr. Mastriano received his Ph.D in 2013 from the University of New Brunswick. When questioned about some of his ideas during the campaign, he sometimes showed his authority by mentioning his doctorate. The issue now is that the dissertation upon which his doctorate is based, has been scrutinized and many think it would not pass muster at most universities. Naturally Dr. Mastriano is upset about this, as is the University of New Brunswick.

   Your natural reaction is likely that we have here is another example of extreme partisanship and assume that this is merely a case of left-wingers going after right-wingers during a political campaign. Although Mastriano does not typically talk to the Lamestream Media, he agrees and noted recently: 

“The left wing goes after our academic work on the right,” said Mastriano, whose hard-right platform has gained national attention since the Trump endorsement. “Of all the things I’ve done, it was brutal .? And I did have concerns that some of the left-leaning professors there would hold my politics or my military background against me.”

It should be noted, however, that problems with the dissertation were spotted years ago and that even a member of his advisory committee raised them back in 2013 when the degree was granted. (As an aside and in UNB's defence, I will say, I don't know how much time Mastriano actually spent on campus in Fredericton, but it is likely that the committee members would have been impressed by the colonel pictured below who already had four masters and would surely have been smart enough to be deferential to them. It simply may have been a perfunctory affair.)


   You are probably less interested in academic politics than American elections, so I will present a short summary of the "Mastriano Affair," followed by sources which you can use to see if the summary makes sense. If you don't want to bother, see the section on "Allegations of Academic Misconduct" in the Wikipedia entry for Mastriano. Or, go directly to the Wikipedia entry for "Alvin York" and look at the "Legacy" section where the controversy over Mastriano's dissertation is discussed.

   Alvin York you may recognize as "Sergeant York" and picture him as Gary Cooper. During World War I his actions were heroic and they may have been made more heroic by Mastriano. Some divine intervention also may have been involved. Mastriano has recognized that mistakes were made in his dissertation and corrected some of them. It is not unusual that mistakes are noticed in such manuscripts, but the volume of them in this dissertation has grown along with the seriousness of the accusations. They were noticed at the time by a member of the history department at the UNB and they have been compiled by a graduate student at the University of Oklahoma who is working on Sgt. York. James Gregory, the Oklahoma researcher, discovered them while doing his own research. They were submitted to the folks at the UNB and the gravity of the situation is now recognized and being investigated. 

   It took a while for the folks at the University of New Brunswick to become interested in all of this and it took longer than usual for the dissertation to be made available. The problems with the dissertation were evident before the American political election, but they became more important during it and the president of the UNB thought it best to wait until after the election to deal with them. They are being looked into as this is written and you will certainly be reading about them in 2023.



Sources:
   If you happen to be a serious scholar interested in military history you can read the actual dissertation. Or, you can read the book by Mastriano (pictured above) which is based on it and is published by the University of Kentucky Press. The folks in Kentucky are also looking into the matter. Perhaps the subtitle of the book suggests that Dr. Mastriano may have been inclined to glorify too much the actions of Sgt. York. 
   Much has been written about the "Mastriano Affair" and more will be. Here are some basic suggestions.
   The Associated Press raised the subject in early September: "Amid Campaign, Mastriano's Disputed Dissertation Made Public," Mark Scolforo, Sept. 9, 2022. 
    The University of New Brunswick responded a month later. Here is the response:
Newsroom - UNB Statement -"Recent Media Coverage Regarding Thesis Debate:"
Oct. 6, 2022:
"The University of New Brunswick (UNB) has a proud 200 + year history as an institution with academic integrity and exemplary educational programs. Recently questions have been raised in the media regarding a thesis by former student Dr. Douglas Mastriano. We recognize that for our students, alumni and the public, there may be some concern or confusion regarding the situation as they hear it portrayed in the media.
We want to assure individuals with concerns that allegations of this nature are taken seriously and investigated accordingly. UNB has a clear policy for dealing with any allegations of research misconduct, which we follow in all cases.
The Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act clearly states that we cannot discuss the personal information of our students, including educational information, whether the student is a public personality or not, without the student's consent.
As stated previously, UNB will review its internal processes and procedures to ensure our systems and policies around the awarding of PhDs remain of the highest standard. This review will be conducted by two qualified independent academics and will begin as soon as possible.
Our commitment to our students and the UNB community to continue to strive for nothing less than academic excellence in all we do has never waivered and will never diminish."

   The Canadian Press then followed up with two stories and there have been many more since:
"University of New Brunswick investigating how Trump ally was awarded PhD in 2013," By Michael MacDonald, The Canadian Press, Posted October 18, 2022 
Among other things, there is this:
"Richard Yeomans, a PhD candidate in UNB’s history department, said students on the Fredericton campus want to know what the university is going to do to uphold its academic standards.
“I think that everybody is just shocked at the fact that the department has said nothing since this became an international news story,” Yeomans said in a recent interview. “The university has chosen to save face rather than come to terms with what this means. A certain level of trust has been breached.”
   This CP story was followed by another:
"New Brunswick University had to Remain Quiet About Mastriano Controversy: UNB Head,"  By Michael MacDonald, The Canadian Press, Posted November 2, 2022:
"The president of the University of New Brunswick says he’s kept a lid on publicly discussing the controversy surrounding an American politician’s PhD because the institution did not want to be accused of interfering in U.S. politics.
Paul Mazerolle said that with U.S. midterm elections slated for next Tuesday, it was decided the university should refrain from commenting on allegations of academic fraud levelled at former history student Doug Mastriano, who is now running for governor of Pennsylvania.
“We have an allegation of academic fraud and it’s happening ? on the eve of an election,” Mazerolle said in an interview late Tuesday.
“In effect, we’re talking about a politicized process. If we undertake activities that could sway people’s views of any particular candidate, I think we have a responsibility to be very careful on how we could influence an election.”
Until now, members of the university’s administration have declined requests for interviews from The Canadian Press."




The Bonus: "Wrapping Up WIth Some Rappers."
  You deserve one after slogging through all of that. It will still have some Canadian content. 
   Back in July 2020, Megan Thee Stallion (pictured above) was shot at and hit by some of the many bullets fired at her. It is not unusual for rappers to be involved in gun fights. It is also not unusual in our gender complicated times, for a female to be referred to by a term usually applied to a male horse.



   The rapper who did the shooting (pictured above) is Tory Lanez and he was just found guilty on three felony counts in December, He faces 20 years in the slammer and will be sentenced soon. Tory Lanez was born as Daystar Shemuel Shua Peterson and he is Canadian. 
("Here's What to Know About Tory Lanez and Megan Thee Stallion," NYT, Dec. 23, 2022.)

Monday, 26 December 2022

Year-End CanCon Continued

   Here is some more CanCon which was found in an American source. It is taken from a piece by Dave Barry who is widely syndicated and hilariously humorous. It is very difficult to make 2022 funny, but in his rundown of that year, Canada gets a mention in February and here it is:

February

"… there is trouble in, of all places, Canada. The news up there is that the capital city, Ottawa (from the Algonquin word “adawe,” meaning “Washington”) is besieged by a massive protest convoy of trucks, clogging the streets, honking horns, blocking traffic and making it impossible for anybody to get anywhere. Granted, this is the situation pretty much every day in, for example, New York City, but apparently in Canada it is a big deal. As tensions mount, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, in a controversial move, invokes emergency powers enabling the government to freeze the protesters’ access to beaver pelts.

Ha-ha! We are poking some good-natured fun at Canada, which is actually a modern nation and an important trading partner that we depend on to supply us with many vital things. Celine Dion is only one example. In all seriousness, the Canadian trucker strike is a significant event that raises some important issues, which everyone immediately stops caring about because of the situation in Ukraine."

In a banner year for our country, it again gets a minor mention in October:

The verified drama on Twitter is interrupted, briefly, by the midterm elections. For weeks the political experts, relying on Scientific Polling Data, have been predicting a Red Wave, with the Republicans taking control of the House and Senate as well as large swaths of Canada. The outlook is so dire that the New York Times tweets out a list of five “evidence-based strategies” for coping with election anxiety, including — we swear we are not making this up — “Plunge your face into a bowl with ice water for 15 to 30 seconds.”

Covering the entire, very long year of 2022 results in a very long column, which also includes illustrations such as this one: 



   Mr. Barry has noticed Canada before and I pointed that out to you a couple of years ago in a post that you probably passed on since it is titled "On Worms." In 1993, Barry reported on the Canadian worm wars and the widely syndicated column had headlines like these: 

"We've Got One Really Slimy Problem Here"; "Worms on the Highway"; "Worms On the Road: Recipe For Disaster" and "CANADIAN IMPORT OPENS A WHOLE CAN OF WORMS." 

If I produced headlines such as those, perhaps I would have more readers. By clicking on the link above you can learn more about the worm battles along the 401 and, you must be a little curious. Since it is Boxing Day and you probably won't bother, here is a snippet from the post which should serve to make you even more curious. Mr. Barry quotes from a CP piece and then raised the important questions:

In May, the Canadian Press Service sent out a report that began: "GEORGETOWN, Ontario - More than 50 worm pickers beat each other with steel pipes and pieces of wood in a battle over territory." The story states that two rival worm-picking groups "arrived at the same spot at the same time" and started fighting over who would pick worms there. A number of people were hospitalized . . . and a van was set on fire.
You may have the same questions I did:
 
1. These people were fighting over WORMS?
 
2. Is there some kind of new drug going around Canada?

Mr. Barry is now 75 and is likely surprised given that he wrote this book:



I am not sure if he is allowing his daughter to date: 




Source: "Dave Barry's Year in Review: No One Cared How You Did on 'Wordle,' And Democracy Died At Least Three Times; (It's Time to Don Surgical Gloves, Reach Deep Down Inside the Big Bag of Stupid That Was the Past 12 Months, and See What We Pull Out." Washington Post, Dec. 25, 2022.


Saturday, 24 December 2022

Year-End CanCon

    There are rumours that Bill C-11 may allow for the manipulation of algorithms so that searches done in Canada will yield more CanCon. Although some people and companies are upset about that prospect, I thought I had better throw in some Canadian items to satisfy the CRTC. As well, the attempt to make CanCon more discoverable may benefit Mulcahy's Miscellany which has yet to find more than a few readers from anywhere. Since I did recently offer a couple of posts about B.C., I will focus on the East Coast. 

Anne of Green Gables



   Every year for almost the last sixty of them (excluding the last couple of pandemic ones), one has been able to go to P.E.I. and watch "Anne of Green Gables - The Musical" in Charlottetown. Many tourists visited the Island for that purpose and then travelled on to Cavendish. A lot of them came all the way from Japan. When it was announced recently that the play would only be offered every second year, there were many complaints and they are still coming in. One couple from Vero Beach, FL., who have a summer home on P.E.I. wrote: “Anne represents the essence of P.E.I. to us and put P.E.I. on the global map,” the couple wrote. “Big mistake, folks.”

  I learned of this from this article in the NYT, Dec.3, 2022 by Ian Austen: "After Half a Century, Prince Edward Island's Musical Tradition Takes a Break." For Canadian content and the complaints see issues of Saltwire, starting with this one: "Commentary: Decision About Anne of Green Gables - The Musical, Based on Money, Alix MacLean, Nov. 29, 2022. 

  A Lucy Maud Montgomery industry is well-established on the Island and you can learn about it here at the L.M. Montgomery Institute. I have mentioned before in Mulcahy's Miscellany that entire journals dedicated to single authors are published and you can add to the list the, Journal of L.M. Montgomery Studies. You can read issues by clicking on the link and this one explains why Anne is popular in Japan: "Red Hair in a Global World: A Japanese History of Anne of Green Gables and Prince Edward Island." For additional examples of such journals see my "Single Author Journals."

Friday, 23 December 2022

Some Books Are Still Valuable

 


 I have generally failed in my mission to convince university librarians to keep a few books in the place. I hope, however, they at least examine them carefully before discarding them. There are still some readers or, perhaps investors, who are willing to pay a lot for them. 

  I mentioned this back in November in "Very Expensive Used Books", when someone paid $25,000 for a copy of Gone With the Wind. It didn't even make the "Top Ten" list of the "Most Expensive Sales in 2022", which is now available on Abe Books. Click on that link to get more information. It is where the image above is found. Here is the basic list:

“I Quattro Libri dell Architettura” [Four Books of Architecture] (first edition, 1570), by Andrea Palladio: $57,750.

“Cook’s Voyages” (first edition, nine vols., 1773-84), by John Hawkesworth: $50,000.

“How to Trade in Stocks” (first edition, 1940), signed by the author, Jesse Livermore: $40,000.

“Cantique des Cantiques de Salomon” [Song of Solomon] (printed on vellum, 1931), wood engravings by Eric Gill: $35,000

“The Time Machine” (first edition, 1895), signed by the author, H.G. Wells: $30,500

“The Tour of the World in 80 Days” (1883), a copy once owned by Stephen King’s grandmother, with a note by the author, Jules Verne: $30,000

“Hinterlassene Werke Des Generals Carl Von Clausewitz” [The Surviving Works of General Carl Von Clausewitz] (10 vols, 1832-7), by Prussian general Carl Von Clausewitz: $27,750

“The Book of Thoth: A Short Essay on the Tarot of the Egyptians” (1944), signed by the author, Aleister Crowley: $27,500.

“Hydrodynamica, sive De Viribus et Motibus Fluidorum Commentarii” [Hydrodynamics, or commentaries on the forces and motions of fluids]  (1738), by Daniel Bernoulli: $25,000.

“Les Vitraux” [Stained Glass] (1973), 24 loose color lithographs, each signed and numbered by the artist, Salvador Dalí: $25,000.

The Bonus
   
The unappealing business book pictured, is not the first such book to be found among the most valuable ones. See my post from earlier in the year: "Valuable Business Books.

The January 6th Report

 


   It may be January 6, 2023 before the Select Committee report is published in book form, so if you had planned to give one to a political junkie friend for Christmas, you better look for a bottle of scotch instead. It will take some time during this busy holiday season for the publishers to edit the 800+ page report and provide an introduction and some notes. The one being published by Random House will have an introduction by Adam Schiff (D-Calif), while the copy from the New Yorker will have a preface by David Remnick and an epilogue by Jamie Raskin (D-MD). If you want an unvarnished one, wait for the one being produced by Melville House. I am going to wait for a graphic one with Cassidy Hutchinson on the cover. 



   To console your political friend, send they a copy of the omnibus spending bill, the short title of which is the "Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023". If you click on that link you can read all 4,155 pp., which is how many it took to show how $1.7 trillion will be spent. "Trillion" is a word we will seeing more of in 2023. 

Canadian Content
   
If you prefer a copy that is printed in our country, it is estimated one will be available in a few years. It has to be in two languages, after all, and that is true as well for the prefatory "Land Acknowledgement." Apparently the folks in Alberta are going to wait for one of the two versions being produced by Skyhorse Publishing - the one with the introduction by Darren Beattie who was a speechwriter for former President Trump and "who disputed his defeat in the 2020 election."

Source:
 
"The Most Sought After Manuscript in Publishing? The Jan. 6 Report," Alexander Alter and Elizabeth A. Harris, New York Times, Dec. 23. 2022.