An Acronym for Our Time
"Just How Bitter, Petty, and Tragic Was Comic-Strip Genius Al Capp?", Steven Heller, Atlantic Magazine, Feb. 28, 2013.
This will be a short post because the information contained within it will soon go 'viral'. Actually I guess it already has, but maybe you missed it because there are so many viral things out there. It has to do with the "Sign Wars."
It was this headline in a major U.S. newspaper that attracted my attention: "How Trash Talking on a Virginia Storefront Sign Led to a Friendly Fight Across the U.S. Canada Border."
A fellow in Christianburg, Virginia, probably bored like the rest of us during these pandemic times, put up a sign taunting the business across the road. They weren't even in the same business, it was all just done in fun and to see if anyone would even notice. Well, it did get noticed, even in Listowel, Ontario and a similar war was started there. The sign below is from the Speedy Glass store in Listowel.
Even the fellows at the fire department got involved.There you have it and by now probably already know all about it.
The Bonus:
It is an odd thing that the fine town of Listowel has been mentioned twice in the last year in the U.S. press, given that all of Canada has only shown up there twelve times since 1947. The other mention involves Corey Conners, the golfer, who grew up there and now lives in Florida where he can play golf in the winter and even during the pandemic.
One does learn from blogging. Although I have passed through and read about Listowel, I only now noticed it is missing an L.
The headline is from the Washington Post, and the author is Sydney Page, May 11, 2021.
The image above is from this morning's New York Times: "Cracked Lake Bed Is a Stark Symbol of Taiwan's Drought. Influencers Take Note," AP, May 10, 2021. I noticed it because I am still inside. It is too cold to head out.
The current drought in Taiwan is really unfortunate for those who live there. It is also unfortunate for us, and not just because we are empathetic. That gets me to "The Butterfly Effect", which has to do with a butterfly flapping its wings and causing a typhoon. In the article it is mentioned that:
Officials call the drought Taiwan’s worst in more than half a century, and it is putting pressure on the island’s semiconductor industry. More than 90 percent of the world’s manufacturing capacity for the most advanced chips is in Taiwan.
You may recall a recent article in the London Free Press where it was noted that the Cami Plant in Ingersoll closed on Feb. 7 and will remain closed until the end of June. There is a shortage of semiconductor chips.
In clear violation of my blogging protocols, I will discuss a couple of current issues, but at least not the pandemic. In my defence I will say that I will focus only on the aspects of the issues which are underreported. Also, it is the case that one of the issues is "Looming", as all the headlines indicate, and by later in the week we will have been dramatically affected by it - or not.
Line 5 is the 'looming' issue and I will say little about it since I have already done so in the post which clearly has one of my clearest titles: Line 5. I even provided a map. It is also is the case that there have been many stories about it. I think it is fair to say, however, that most of them indicate that clearly the shutdown will not happen and that it shouldn't because the economic results would be devastating. That is, our politicians and we Canadians mostly seem concerned only with the economic consequences, while the Governor of Michigan is worried more about the possible environmental impact on the Great Lakes if the pipeline was to burst. The irony was noticed by Rex Murphy as this headline indicates: "How's Trudeau Going to Get Out of this Line 5 Pickle and Keep Oil Flowing?" He notes: "The threat that by May 12, Gov. Whitmer will shut down Line 5 to Ontario, is so beautiful an issue it should be hanging in an art gallery.... For what have we to look at? We have two leaders, Greener than shamrocks, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Gov. Whitmer, who see themselves plucked by the goddess of destiny herself, as human ambulances rushing to save the Earth from global warming."
Although I am sure that environmental groups and Indigenous ones think a break in the pipeline would not be a good thing for the Great Lakes, the 'mainstream media' seem to worry only about the business disruption. It is sometimes mentioned obliquely that the environmental impact would be more negative if the line is shutdown, because thousands of rail cars and trucks would have to be utilized to keep us supplied. I have not yet read a good newspaper piece that discusses directly what would happen if millions of gallons of petroleum products started pouring into the Great Lakes. I suppose it is natural to pay more attention to an event that is supposed to happen on May 12, rather than to hypothesize about one that may or may not occur a few months or years from now. It is also the case that our 'mainstream media' now have few tributaries, most of them issuing from the same source. The only Canadian newspaper I am aware of that has presented the environmental side, is one you probably don't read and may not know about - The National Observer, which recently published this article: "Line 5 is an Environmental Disaster Waiting to Happen," Trevor Greene, April 6, 2021.
Still Not Whistling Past the Graveyard
Our Old Age Theme today is presented in the form of a book review. Unfortunately the topic is still the depressing one of old age and the concomitant one of death. Although the word 'concomitant' is used deliberately, I am aware that many of the elderly colleagues in my cohort are now beginning to think that old age can be dramatically extended until all the "natural causes" of death are eliminated --- or defeated by the rigid application of a spartan and healthy lifestyle. The question is, I suppose, how much of your life do you wish to sacrifice to delay death?
The book under review is Natural Causes by Barbara Ehrenreich. They are both pictured above. You are likely to recognize her name since she has authored many books. You are also likely to assume that she is a progressive cultural critic who perhaps tackles too many topical topics to be taken seriously. Only the first part of the assumption is correct.
From the Introduction we learn why she questions much medical advice and also that she has the credentials to do so. It was upsetting for her to learn that it has been discovered that "the immune system actually abets the growth and spread of tumors, which is like saying that the fire department is indeed staffed by arsonists." That such a "paradoxical" finding could be disturbing is understandable, particularly since she had studied the macrophages which are now seen to be sabotaging the immune system. They were the focus of her study when she earned a PhD in cellular immunology.
The title of the first chapter is, "Midlife Revolt" and from these sample sentences you will be able to figure out what she is revolting against. The first sentence is:
"In the last few years I have given up on the many medical measures -- cancer screenings, annual exams, Pap smears, for example -- expected of a responsible person with health insurance...."
Followed by:
"I knew I was going against my own long-bias in favor of preventive medical care as opposed to expensive and invasive high-tech curative interventions...."
"I also understood that I was going against the grain for my particular demographic. Most of my educated, middle-class friends had begun to double down on their health-related efforts at the onset of middle age, if not earlier...."
"I had a different reaction to aging: I gradually came to realize that I was old enough to die, by which I am not suggesting that each of us bears an expiration date...."
"Once I realized I was old enough to die, I decided that I was old enough not to incur any more suffering, annoyance, or boredom in the pursuit of a longer life.
She gives good reasons for the decision to avoid such procedures as a colonoscopy and points out that "there are even sizable constituencies for discredited tests."
If you are believer in "Successful Aging", then you shouldn't be reading this post and you definitely don't want to read the chapter about it in Natural Causes. The chapter title, "Successful Aging" is in quotes, because Ehrenreich realizes there is no such thing and she takes issue with drivel such as this, which is apparently found in a book with the title, Younger Next Year, under this subhead: "Normal Aging Isn't Normal:" The more I looked at the science, the more it became clear to me that such ailments and deterioration [heart attacks, strokes, the common cancers, diabetes, most falls, fractures] are not a normal part of growing old. They are an outrage.
Naturally, Ehrenreich disagrees with the above and asks: And who is responsible for this outrage? Well, each of us is individually responsible. All of the books in the successful aging literature insist that a long and healthy life is within the reach of anyone who will submit to the required discipline.
At this point, unfortunately I suppose, I believe it is far more likely that I will die of natural causes than it is that I will be younger next year, even if I work out much more and drink much less. Some reviews follow for those who wonder if I make all of this up:
The Opinions of Others:
"Ditch the Quest for Eternal Life and Just Enjoy the Days You Have, "By Rachel Newcomb, Washington Post, May 4, 2018.
Americans have a history of obsession with fads designed to help us live forever. But to what end? Death, notes Barbara Ehrenreich in her new book, “Natural Causes,” still awaits us all. In this lively cultural history of our attempts to control our fate, she details the extreme lengths we will go to keep from dying.
"Barbara Ehrenreich Urges Us to Accept, Accept the Dying of the Light," Parul Sehgal, New York Times, April 10, 2018.
Barbara Ehrenreich wants you to know that you are going to die. Get used to it, and get beyond it... Targets include unnecessary medical tests, notably annual physical exams. The fitness craze is an easy mark — though she herself is a gym rat, Ehrenreich looks askance at workouts that suck hours of valuable time out of a person’s day and, longevity wise, have a low cost-benefit ratio.